Image

Kristina Keneally now wrong on Kassam, guns and free speech

It’s said that bias isn’t what you put in, it’s what you choose to leave out. Kristina Keneally has demonstrated at best a factual ignorance, and at worst, a deliberate attempt to use US tragedy’s as a means to score political points. In the past week, two mass-shootings, one in Dayton Ohio, the other in El-Paso Texas, rocked the United States. The Labor Senator and Home Affairs spokeswoman in a Sydney Morning Herald op-ed titled, We can’t bury our heads when it comes to right-wing extremism wrote: On Sunday a wave of sadness consumed me as I saw Dayton, Ohio……

It’s said that bias isn’t what you put in, it’s what you choose to leave out. Kristina Keneally has demonstrated at best a factual ignorance, and at worst, a deliberate attempt to use US tragedy’s as a means to score political points. In the past week, two mass-shootings, one in Dayton Ohio, the other in El-Paso Texas, rocked the United States.

The Labor Senator and Home Affairs spokeswoman in a Sydney Morning Herald op-ed titled, We can’t bury our heads when it comes to right-wing extremism wrote:

On Sunday a wave of sadness consumed me as I saw Dayton, Ohio – where I attended university and lived for seven years – become the latest site of a mass shooting in the United States. Blocks from my old neighbourhood, nine people had been killed and 27 injured in less than 30 seconds. Hours earlier, 20 people had been killed in El Paso, Texas, with the shooter reportedly inspired by the Christchurch attacks, according to a white nationalist, anti-immigrant manifesto posted online.

She leaves no doubt as to the Ethno-nationalistic, xenophobic motives of the El-Paso shooter. In fact, you could probably guess after reading the opening lines and the Title where the story was going. But it’s helpful to understand why Keneally omits the intentions of the Dayton mass murderer. The perpetrator, 24-year-old Connor Betts, was a fan of Elizabeth Warren,  Antifa, and Socialism. He was clearly mentally unstable, and according to reports, previously written a ‘kill list’ of former classmates.

To omit this information is ethically dubious, particularly in the context of ascribing White Nationalism as the raison d’etre of the other massacre. Mainstream media, in general, is willfully ignorant of the intentions behind the politically inconvenient shootings, like that of Republican Stephen Scalise and the Pulse nightclub. Hard Core Bernie supporters and Anti-LGBT radical Islamists don’t fit the narrative.  We can all agree that these are absolute tragic circumstances, & they shouldn’t be used to score political points. However, if for ethical journalism it’s important to disseminate the motives behind one shooting, and draw from it a sweeping conclusion with the potential for substantial legislative action, then it should be equally compelling to do so for all shootings.

It is the ominous backdrop of a public tragedy that is so often used to attack the institution of gun ownership and The Right in general. In Australia, the new favourite whipping post is the Australian Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). Keneally landed herself in some hot water last week, accusing ‘Brexit Badboy’ and CPAC speaker Raheem Kassam of ‘vilifying Muslims,’ espousing anti-LGBT views and being deserving of a visa ban. 

Doubling down on whipping up CPAC hysteria, knowingly or not, the old favourite of  ‘guilt by association’  channels the isolationist practice of now-deceased community organiser, and subject of Hilary Clinton’s senior thesis, Saul Alinsky. He posted that to inflict maximum damage to an institution, you should freeze and alienate individuals within it. People hurt faster than traditions. Rather than only slamming the second amendment, you attack Kassam and life-long NRA members Matt Schlapp and Dan Schnieder. CPAC becomes radioactive and framed as providing ‘fertile ground for the alt-right to become normalised.’

It’s in this disturbing environment that we have Morrison effectively encouraging further radicalisation by welcoming hate to our shores in the form of CPAC. You don’t prevent violence by providing a platform to those who believe gun ownership is a god-given right.

Cue the scary music. It’s difficult to find a real link between ‘hate’, ‘gun rights,’ and the Right because as statistics demonstrate, a substantial portion of left-leaning Americans also believe in the 2nd amendment. According to a 2018 YouGov poll, only 38% of Democrats (US Equivalent of ALP) want the second amendment repealed. In total, only 21% of American’s are “strongly” or “somewhat” in favour of Second Amendment repeal.

Economist/YouGov Poll

If respect for 2A is somehow a gateway to Richard Spencer and the Alt-Right then the democrats are going to have a difficult time getting any affirmative action past a lot of hateful rank and file members.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

"By refusing to name its own moral foundations, the state undermines its ability to openly distinguish between belief systems that can coexist within its legal and moral order and those that fundamentally conflict with them. A society that cannot articulate its core moral commitments cannot coherently defend them."
By
by Staff WriterJan 16, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026
UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

"Free communication has always posed a problem for those who seek to centralise authority. Open platforms like X allow claims to be challenged, narratives to be contested, and power to be scrutinised. That is precisely why they become targets when governments feel uncomfortable, embarrassed, or threatened."
By
by Staff WriterJan 12, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.