Image

Judge orders 22-week pregnant woman to have an abortion against her will

A British judge has ordered that an abortion be performed on a 22-week pregnant mother, despite objections from the woman and the woman’s mother. Advertisement Justice Nathalie Lieven said the ruling was in the best interest of the woman after she was diagnosed with “moderately severe” learning difficulties. “I am acutely conscious of the fact that for the State to order a woman to have a termination where it appears that she doesn’t want it is an immense intrusion,” the justice said in the ruling. “I have to operate in [her] best interest, not on society’s view of termination.” A……

A British judge has ordered that an abortion be performed on a 22-week pregnant mother, despite objections from the woman and the woman’s mother.

Justice Nathalie Lieven said the ruling was in the best interest of the woman after she was diagnosed with “moderately severe” learning difficulties.

“I am acutely conscious of the fact that for the State to order a woman to have a termination where it appears that she doesn’t want it is an immense intrusion,” the justice said in the ruling. “I have to operate in [her] best interest, not on society’s view of termination.”

A social worker and the woman’s mother both said the baby should not be aborted. The woman’s mother, a former midwife, even told the court that she planned on taking care of the child with the daughter’s help, Sky News reported.

The judge, however, suggested the mother lacks the mental capacity to fully appreciate what it means to have a baby.

“I think she would like to have a baby in the same way she would like to have a nice doll,” Justice Lieven said.

The judge also reportedly dismissed the idea that the child could be placed in foster care, suggesting the mother would suffer more distress if the baby was taken away alive, rather than killed in the womb.

“Pregnancy, although real to her, doesn’t have a baby outside her body she can touch,” the judge said.

On July 14, 1933, Nazi Germany enacted the Law for Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring, which resulted in the compulsory sterilisation of any citizens deemed intellectually disabled, mentally ill, or physically deformed.

During the Nuremberg trials, when the subject of compulsory sterilisation was brought up, many Nazis reportedly defended their actions by suggesting their inspiration came from the United States.

They were referring to the Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, who Dinesh D’Souza has argued, helped to supply the blueprints for some of the worst acts carried out by the Nazis.

According to D’Souza, Hitler got some of his most maniacal and destructive ideas from the American Left.

“I’m not saying that there were similar things going on, I’m saying Hitler literally lifted it from the blueprints, from the examples, supplied by the Democrats and the Left.

“A slogan that Margaret Sanger had, which was published in her magazine, Birth Control Review [was]: ‘More children from the fit, fewer children from the unfit.’ This is the chief aim of birth control,” D’Souza said.

While Judge Lieven said her decision was based on the best interests of the mother, it’s hard not to see a comparison. While the stated rationale may differ, the outcome remains the same and sets a frightening precedent on the slippery slope we’re already on.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
John MacArthur Enters Glory

John MacArthur Enters Glory

"This evening, his faith became sight."
By
by Staff WriterJul 15, 2025
Trump DOJ Dismisses Charges Against Doctor Who Defied Democrat COVID Mandates

Trump DOJ Dismisses Charges Against Doctor Who Defied Democrat COVID Mandates

"Dr. Moore gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so."
By
by Rod LampardJul 15, 2025
John MacArthur Hospitalized, Nearing Death

John MacArthur Hospitalized, Nearing Death

"A statement from the church on Sunday indicated that the 86-year-old may soon be 'in the presence of the Lord.'"
By
by Staff WriterJul 14, 2025
Renewed Calls for ‘Castle Law’ in Australia: You Break In, You Forfeit Your Rights

Renewed Calls for ‘Castle Law’ in Australia: You Break In, You Forfeit Your Rights

"Victims do not feel safe in their own homes knowing that offenders have more rights than occupants."
By
by Staff WriterJul 13, 2025
Europe Witnesses Surge in Anti-Christian Violence

Europe Witnesses Surge in Anti-Christian Violence

"A key report has revealed a sharp rise in crimes targeting Christians, documenting 2,444 incidents across 35 countries and highlighting escalating hostility against Christian communities."
By
by Staff WriterJul 12, 2025
Melbourne Royal Show Bans Annual Christian Exhibit, Sparking Religious Freedom Debate

Melbourne Royal Show Bans Annual Christian Exhibit, Sparking Religious Freedom Debate

“This is not just about one booth — it’s about ensuring that all Australians have the right to peacefully express their faith in public venues.”
By
by Rod LampardJul 11, 2025
We Don’t Need a “Hate Registry” Run by People Who Think the Bible Is “Hate”

We Don’t Need a “Hate Registry” Run by People Who Think the Bible Is “Hate”

"The concern isn’t whether people should have the 'freedom to hate their enemies.' The concern is that the same government already labelling basic Christian doctrine as 'hate' is now building a system to monitor, catalogue, and punish those guilty of heresy."
By
by Ben DavisJul 11, 2025
Race-Based “Antisemitism” Laws May Do More Harm Than Good

Race-Based “Antisemitism” Laws May Do More Harm Than Good

"Why not simply deport any foreigner who commits a crime against any Australian, regardless of their race? Why introduce a race-specific policy when the principle of equal protection under the law should be the standard in a free and just society?"
By
by Staff WriterJul 10, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.