Image

Does everything have to be seen through the prism of gender?

A recent opinion piece on news.com.au has argued that women should be outraged at the recent vote to decriminalise abortion by the Queensland Parliament, because of the strong gender divide between the yes and no votes. You see, we should be outraged that most female MPs voted yes and that male MP’s dominated the no vote. The picture presented here is that the vast majority of women are in favour of killing babies and it’s that evil patriarchy who are holding them back – men who don’t deserve to contribute to this debate because they don’t have a uterus. While……

A recent opinion piece on news.com.au has argued that women should be outraged at the recent vote to decriminalise abortion by the Queensland Parliament, because of the strong gender divide between the yes and no votes.

You see, we should be outraged that most female MPs voted yes and that male MP’s dominated the no vote. The picture presented here is that the vast majority of women are in favour of killing babies and it’s that evil patriarchy who are holding them back – men who don’t deserve to contribute to this debate because they don’t have a uterus.

While that may seem like a good story, the facts prove otherwise. After I analysed the breakdown of the vote by gender and political leaning (left = ALP, GRN, IND / right = LNP, KAP, ONP) – I noted the following:

The author is partly right – 80% of female MPs did vote yes compared with only 43% of male MPs. However, that is misleading – as it doesn’t take into account political leaning – which is very significant. 98% of the political left voted for abortion compared with only 7% of the political right – which is a much stronger differential. In a blow to identity politics, it shows that political ideas and philosophy matter much more than gender. If you want diversity – diversity of thought counts for much more than gender!

While 80% of women voted yes, only 17% of women on the political right voted yes. Conservative women tend to be strongly against abortion – which goes against the narrative that women are overwhelmingly supportive of abortion.

Almost all women on the political left (96%) supported abortion – and since they make up 80% of all female MPs – then that is why female MPs so overwhelmingly supported abortion. It merely reflects the demography of the QLD parliament – which is quite different from the general population. There is a much higher proportion of conservative women who are against abortion in the community (compared to the proportion in QLD parliament). Many of them are spending huge amounts of time raising their children.

While a majority of male MPs voted against abortion (57%), all of the male MPs of the political left (100%!) voted for abortion. So much for the patriarchy holding back women’s right to kill their babies – in fact, the patriarchy is aiding and abetting them! Furthermore, these male MPs on the political left were more supportive of abortion that the female MPs on the political left where only 96% voted for abortion!

The reason that the majority of male MPs voted against abortion is due to the fact that only 5% of the male MPs on the political right voted for it – who make up 61% of all male MPs. They, like their fellow female MPs on the political right, were strongly against the killing of unborn babies – and good on them (both male and female).

Elections matter. Given the political left has a majority in the unicameral QLD Parliament (53%) – the bill to decriminalise abortion succeeded in passing. If you value human life – you should penalise parties that take a stand against it. What issue could be more important to base your vote on? While 95% of the MPs on the political right opposed abortion, they unfortunately didn’t have a majority in the parliament.

So at the end of the day, it’s more likely that your political leaning (left or right) will have a much larger impact on whether you support abortion than your gender. Worldview and philosophical ideas matter much more than gender.

If you believe that every man and woman is made in God’s image, equal in dignity and all deserving of the right to life, you can’t be in support of murder – especially of the smallest and most vulnerable in our society. If only the men and women on the political left in Australia believed that and acted consistently with it. And hopefully, the men and women of the political right will stay true to that ideal – despite the heavy pressures on them to compromise.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

"By refusing to name its own moral foundations, the state undermines its ability to openly distinguish between belief systems that can coexist within its legal and moral order and those that fundamentally conflict with them. A society that cannot articulate its core moral commitments cannot coherently defend them."
By
by Staff WriterJan 16, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026
UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

"Free communication has always posed a problem for those who seek to centralise authority. Open platforms like X allow claims to be challenged, narratives to be contested, and power to be scrutinised. That is precisely why they become targets when governments feel uncomfortable, embarrassed, or threatened."
By
by Staff WriterJan 12, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.