Image

Vaccine Passports for Worship Place Members Under Church Discipline for Illegitimate Reasons

"In the end, to ban healthy believers from public worship for any reason other than unrepentant sin, including those based on whatever arbitrary medical treatments the government deems necessary at any particular time of the day, is to ultimately exchange the gracious staff of the Great Shepherd for the often cruel and unforgiving rod of Caesar."

With the New South Wales state government suggesting that their “roadmap to freedom” will allow for vaccinated-only worship services going forward, the question has been raised, are there any biblical grounds for denying healthy people entry into worship based on their vaccination status?

The issue is currently being hotly debated among church leaders in Australia after the government implied on Thursday that once the state passes the 70 percent double jabbed target, the return to in-person worship will be limited only to church members who have been “fully vaccinated.”

At present, there is no uniform response from church leaders and denominations. Some ministers have resolved to keep their churches closed until all of their members are permitted to return for in-person worship. Others are opting for a bolder stand, saying they will refuse to make any vaccination checks a requirement for entry and vowing to welcome all who wish to enter, vaccinated or otherwise.

But perhaps the most concerning category includes those “ministers” who have said they intend on turning healthy unvaccinated congregants away under the justification that the government’s measures are supposedly “only temporary.”

While this latter group insists their course of action is guided by the biblical principle of “loving your neighbour as yourself,” what these individuals seemingly fail to realize is that implementing vaccination certificates in the church, in effect, places certain members of the congregation under church discipline on an illegitimate and unbiblical, and therefore unloving, basis. Even if it’s done so temporarily.

The reason for this is simple. The only grounds the Bible gives for temporarily denying a professing Christian access to corporate worship and sacraments is when it is carried out as a discipline for unrepentant sin.

According to the Scriptures, to suspend a person from church, even if it’s only for a time, is not an action that should be taken lightly or enacted arbitrarily without sufficient biblical grounds for doing so. In fact, Jesus said it is the final recourse in the four-step disciplinary process within the church (Matt. 18:15-17). It is to be carried out only in response to ongoing and persistent rebellion against God’s laws and commands.

In essence, banning a member from public worship is a small glimpse of the final judgment when Christ “will separate people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats” (Matt. 25:31-40). It is the severest course of action the church can take against an individual, either to protect the church from unrepentant sin (Eph. 5:3; 1 Cor. 5:9-13) or as a warning to a wayward professing brother, who risks being forever ostracised from God if he persists in rebellion. It is, for a time, to treat a Christian as though he is not a Christian at all.

In the New Testament, to deny an individual access to worship is to treat them as an unbeliever, alien to the covenant with God (Matt. 18:17). It is to deliver them into the hands of Satan for the destruction of the flesh (1 Cor. 5:5; 1 Tim. 1:20). It is to wield the Great Shepherd’s rod, to either correct the course of wandering sheep, if not strike down their foes (1 Cor. 4:21).

“Oh, but they’re not really excluded,” someone will say. “They can still stream the service online, break their own bread, drink their own grape juice, sprinkle their own water on their heads!” Along with any individual who is currently under church discipline for legitimate reasons. If virtual church is just as authentic as in-person worship, then there is no meaningful method in which the elders can enforce genuine church discipline for persistent rebellion against God.

In the end, to ban healthy believers from public worship for any reason other than unrepentant sin, including those based on whatever arbitrary medical treatments the government deems necessary at any particular time of the day, is to ultimately exchange the gracious staff of the Great Shepherd for the often cruel and unforgiving rod of Caesar.

It is to hand the regulation of worship into the hands of the state, thereby rendering to Caesar the things that are Gods (Matt. 22:21). It is to shut the kingdom in the face of those whom Caesar, not God, deems unfit for entry. It is to implement a door list of unbiblical requirements. It is to act as an indiscriminate enforcing and disciplinary arm of the state against those for whom Christ died.

But if the Great Shepherd is willing to lay down his life for His sheep, to tear down the curtain of division through his flesh, to grant access into the Most Holy Place by His own blood, what terrible things might He do to the wolves and hired hands who come between Him and His flock by closing what He has permanently opened?

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
‘Treasonous Conspiracy’: Gabbard Drops Bombshell Intel Alleging Obama-Directed Coup Against Trump

‘Treasonous Conspiracy’: Gabbard Drops Bombshell Intel Alleging Obama-Directed Coup Against Trump

“These documents detail a treasonous conspiracy by officials at the highest levels of the Obama White House to subvert the will of the American people and try to usurp the President from fulfilling his mandate,” Gabbard said.
By
by Staff WriterJul 19, 2025
Melbourne Royal Show Apologises, Reinstates 108-Year-Old Bible Booth After Ban Backlash 

Melbourne Royal Show Apologises, Reinstates 108-Year-Old Bible Booth After Ban Backlash 

"To the Show’s credit, this is a complete turnaround from the contents of a rejection letter sent to Good News booth volunteers last November."
By
by Rod LampardJul 18, 2025
UK Petition to Track Child Sex Offender Demographics Hits 150K Signatures in 24 Hours

UK Petition to Track Child Sex Offender Demographics Hits 150K Signatures in 24 Hours

"Without this information, critical patterns may be missed, weakening efforts to prevent abuse and protect vulnerable children."
By
by Staff WriterJul 18, 2025
Fauci’s Pre-Emptive Pardon Faces Scrutiny Amid Autopen Abuse Allegations

Fauci’s Pre-Emptive Pardon Faces Scrutiny Amid Autopen Abuse Allegations

Fauci’s pardon is now at the center of a growing investigation into whether Biden’s staff exploited his cognitive decline to issue unauthorized clemencies using an autopen.
By
by Rod LampardJul 17, 2025
Matt Walsh Demands Answers in Epstein Case: “We Can’t Move On”

Matt Walsh Demands Answers in Epstein Case: “We Can’t Move On”

"We want those people to be dragged in front of us, weeping and begging for mercy. We want them exposed and humiliated and shamed and punished in the harshest and most painful way, because that's justice."
By
by Staff WriterJul 16, 2025
On Arresting Decline

On Arresting Decline

"Once decline is set in, then there is not really much that even the best leaders can do to stop it."
By
by Matthew LittlefieldJul 16, 2025
John MacArthur Enters Glory

John MacArthur Enters Glory

"This evening, his faith became sight."
By
by Staff WriterJul 15, 2025
Trump DOJ Dismisses Charges Against Doctor Who Defied Democrat COVID Mandates

Trump DOJ Dismisses Charges Against Doctor Who Defied Democrat COVID Mandates

"Dr. Moore gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so."
By
by Rod LampardJul 15, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.