Image

The Four Year Mirage of Victory

As America determines the outcome of the election, it's a good time for the modern right to engage in some much-needed self-reflection.

As America determines the outcome of the election, it’s a good time for the modern right to engage in some much-needed self-reflection. For four years, we have revelled in mocking the American left for their faulty predictions and constant political rage – but to what end?

Yes, poking fun at the stereotypical left-wingers was (and is) a lot of fun. Still, it seems the right-wing of politics has confused purposefully provocative political speech or “sh*t-posting” with legitimate activism and political engagement. For four years, right-wingers distracted themselves with memes about angry lefties and comment section battles. Meanwhile, the left-wing media, big tech, and the Democrats had no such distractions and mobilised with a singular relentless political goal – a goal likely achieved in a Biden presidency.

It’s time for the right to mobilise with a single and relentless political goal of its own. We can undo the errors of the past by replacing conservatism with a movement of social and political change that brings us closer to the fundamental ideals of the west. This movement must see the economy as a useful tool to achieve social cohesion and prosperity, and not as a means unto itself. We must understand free trade is not a principle to adhere to, but an exercise in benefiting consumers that can go too far and hurt our nation. Law and order, a shared common language, a strong family unit, and cultural homogeneity based on Christian principles are the goals we must pursue.

Above all, we have to use the power at our disposal to achieve these ends. The government should not allow Facebook and Twitter to destroy our free speech because they’re private corporations. Those in power should not allow Marxist to indoctrinate our children in the schools we fund. The government should not allow parents to mutilate their children’s genitals or change their hormonal make-up. And no, rhetoric is not enough. No number of YouTube videos and Podcasts can achieve this end. Wishful thinking about the battle of ideas bringing about meaningful change is cute, but the truth is that the left’s progress came from the government, and only action from the state can undo it.

It is entirely possible, though not likely, that Donald Trump can remain President. Even so, this fact would not negate a single point in this article. Donald Trump, along with mainstream American conservatives, failed on many crucial issues. So as the wounds of defeat remain fresh, let us look back and address some of the many mistakes made over the last four years.

An excellent place to start is the illusion of victory. For four years the conservative movement gleefully proclaimed their neverending achievements: new judges, a booming economy, and sound foreign policy. And while these achievements are not insignificant, they were distractions from the more significant domestic battle taking place in plain sight. Social media giants began censoring the President’s supporters, and while Trump loudly condemned them, he did nothing to stop them. Four years later, Twitter is actively censoring President Trump himself.

Similar losses are evident in the cultural battle, where in the last four years the left has taken near-totalitarian control. And it’s no surprise considering the conservative culture war took place on enemy turf. Think of one prominent conservative “culture warrior” that doesn’t operate mainly on Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube – the very same platforms that seek to destroy their movement. In essence, conservatives built up artillery that their enemies could eliminate with the click of a button. In the last four years, the left-wing invasion of every relevant cultural institution, including Hollywood, education, professional sports, and business accelerated dramatically. Does that look like winning to you?

Perhaps the most apparent reason for the losses of conservatism is the death of conservatism itself. True conservatism has been a walking corpse for a very long time, and there are two main reasons for that.

The first is, for conservatism to be relevant, there needs to be something left to conserve. There isn’t. Nearly every aspect of our society that conservatives deem worthy of preserving is long gone. Consider freedom of speech as an example. What are American Conservatives conserving there? Indeed, the government cannot jail a person for expressing an opinion. Still, that person can be booted from social media and have their life ruined by the mob. Free speech is like many other conservative causes: the appearance of it exists, but not the function.

The second reason for the death of conservatism is that we forgot what it is. Somewhere along the way, we forgot that small government, free trade, and capitalism are tools that we use to achieve an end in our society, but are not ends unto themselves. Unfortunately, conservatism has morphed into a mix of economy worship, liberalism, and leftist premises. For all his faults, Trump realised that numbers on a spreadsheet showing GDP growth did not eliminate the suffering of middle-class workers whose jobs were now overseas and whose wages were depressed by immigration. His actions in trying to address this infuriated many establishment “conservatives.” In the modern conservative movement, religious liberty, classical education, and social stability take a back seat to the economic machine.

The adoption of leftist premises is another knife in the back of the conservative movement. Today, so-called conservatives decry issues like identity politics while engaging in it themselves (see Turning Point USA’s black, Latino, and women’s leadership summits). More recently, conservatives celebrate the “year of the republican woman,” celebrating that many successful candidates this election happened to be females. Oh, and did you hear about Amy Coney Barrett’s adopted children? How cool is it that two of them are black?

In essence, the only thing that meaningfully separates modern conservatism from left-leaning libertarianism is a passive rhetorical endorsement of religious values, an ornamental rejection of political correctness, and a mostly disingenuous condemnation of legal prostitution and recreational drug use.

The likely reality is that Trump will not win. Despite all the hair-on-fire rhetoric about a Biden presidency, he’s probably going to govern like a typical corporatist establishment democrat and not a Marxist. Likely conservatives will go back to being court jesters and controlled opposition, only slowing the left’s agenda but doing nothing to reverse it. But it doesn’t have to be this way.

Let us wave a heartfelt farewell to conservatism and the societal decline across the west that it has failed to stop. A social revival is possible, but it can’t happen alone.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
There’s No Such Thing as a Religiously Neutral Society

There’s No Such Thing as a Religiously Neutral Society

"Absolute freedom is only possible in a lawless society. So, whether it is secularism or Christianity taking precedence, every alternative will be restrained at the point in which it conflicts with what the reigning system deems “good” for the wider society."
By
by Ben DavisApr 8, 2025
Is Christianity Jewish?

Is Christianity Jewish?

"The Church is neither Jewish nor Gentile, it is a new race, the third race."
By
by Matthew LittlefieldApr 8, 2025
Musk Warns Immigration Threatens National Identity: “A Country Is Its People”

Musk Warns Immigration Threatens National Identity: “A Country Is Its People”

"A country is its people. This is a fundamental concept that is truly obvious," Musk said.
By
by Staff WriterApr 7, 2025
The USA vs. The West: A Must-Read Viral Post by Martyn Iles

The USA vs. The West: A Must-Read Viral Post by Martyn Iles

"'Oh, the Americans and their guns!' we say, in our smug way. Yes, they have a warrior culture. We do not. We don't have to, because we're a leech on theirs."
By
by Staff WriterApr 6, 2025
LGBTQA Apostasy Laws

LGBTQA Apostasy Laws

"While the government promotes initiatives to encourage people to 'come out,' it simultaneously threatens criminal penalties against those who would even pray with someone seeking to step away from that identity."
By
by Ben DavisApr 5, 2025
Australians Could Face Up to Five Years in Jail for Praying

Australians Could Face Up to Five Years in Jail for Praying

"The new law makes it illegal to engage in prayer or counselling intended to change or suppress a person’s sexuality or gender identity—even if that person requests it..."
By
by Ben DavisApr 5, 2025
Todd Komarnicki’s “Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Spy, Assassin” Doesn’t Disappoint

Todd Komarnicki’s “Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Spy, Assassin” Doesn’t Disappoint

Rod Lampard reviews Todd Komarnicki’s “Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Spy, Assassin”
By
by Rod LampardApr 5, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.