Image

Studio10 Hosts Criticize ‘Transphobic’ Man for Refusing to Date a ‘Woman’ With a Penis, Liken It to Racism

"That's like me going, 'I'd never date an Italian.'"

What a classic example of discriminatory behaviour being redefined by the radical Left.  Apparently, male and female are terms that have been all but done away with in order to make room for the new and accepted language of ‘cisgender’. I am supposed to define myself now as a ‘ciswoman’ meaning someone who identifies with the gender I was assigned at birth.  

Yet, a person who ‘identifies’ (or in actual reality simply IS) the most common of all sexual persuasions… heterosexual…  is not permitted to either retain their own language or add to the alphabet soup that has become the norm. 

Studio10 co-hosts have said it’s transphobic for men to say they would never date a transgender-woman, likening it to those who refuse to date people of a particular ethnic background.

“Why do you need to label yourself ‘super-straight’,” one host said. “This is kind of ridiculous. And it is transphobic, if you ask me, to think that you’re entitled to have a label of ‘super-straight’ because you don’t want to date a trans-woman.

“You know, we can’t help who we fall in love with. And people fall in love with people because they are attracted to them. What’s to say that this fellow won’t be attracted to a woman who happens to be trans.”

“That’s like me going, ‘I’d never date an Italian,’ or I’d never date a this, or I’d never date a that. It’s silly,” another host added.

This guy doesn’t want to date, or one presumes as an extension, have sex with trans women.  He has a sexual orientation that encompasses wanting to be intimate with someone who has a vagina and breasts… a real vagina and real breasts, the kind that women are born with.  

According to the ridiculous commentary of these reporters, this is discriminatory, transphobic and sad… sad that anyone would ever think like this apparently.

For goodness sake!   While we may laugh at the absurdity that straight men should want to have sex with trans women who may in fact still have a penis we may lose sight of the fact that this also goes for gay and lesbian people.   If a woman has a sexual preference for women she must be discriminating against a trans person, with a penis, if she states a preference for women.  The alphabet is growing both larger and shorter at the same time – all you L’s and G’s don’t belong here anymore!

To top it off, the male commentator suggests that saying something like ‘I don’t like dating Italian’s is the same as saying ‘I don’t like dating trans’.

We might want to laugh such idiocy off, but look at the serious faces on these people… they are not joking.  Nor are our legislators or professional bodies as they legislate away our language and our rights, in the name of ‘rights’ of a different kind, the kind determined by those in control, on a whim and fancy it would seem… ‘fluirights’ like ‘fluigender’ is the way of the future.  

The consequences of dissent from this path are becoming more serious on a daily basis.  Time to wake up.  #alarmistgatekeeping


Debbie Garratt is an educator and researcher on reproductive health and relationship issues and Executive Director of Real Choices Australia. Her recently completed PhD explores manipulative discourse in the context of controversial and polarising issues.

realchoices.org.au
iregretmyabortion.org.au
Support Debbie’s work

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026
UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

"Free communication has always posed a problem for those who seek to centralise authority. Open platforms like X allow claims to be challenged, narratives to be contested, and power to be scrutinised. That is precisely why they become targets when governments feel uncomfortable, embarrassed, or threatened."
By
by Staff WriterJan 12, 2026
Self-Regulation or State Control: How Society’s Moral Collapse Hands Government Power

Self-Regulation or State Control: How Society’s Moral Collapse Hands Government Power

"Public degeneracy doesn’t just corrode society, it empowers the state. Once enough people normalise moral disorder, government intervention stops being the exception and becomes the rule."
By
by Staff WriterJan 10, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.