Image

Labor in Damage Control After Turning Citizenship Ceremony Into “Catwalk for Candidates”

"It’s extraordinary for Home Affairs Department citizenship ceremonies to ram through 12,000 citizenships days before the election is called.”

Someone forgot to tell Labor MP Tony Burke, that Australian Citizenship ceremonies are not for political campaigning.

The code of conduct clearly states, “Citizenship ceremonies must be non-commercial, apolitical, bipartisan, and secular.”

Second, “They must not be used as forums for political, partisan, or religious expression for the distribution of political material or the sale of souvenirs.”

Twenty years in politics strongly suggests Burke – a Labor lifer, and career politician – knew the code, yet seemingly chose to betray it.

Putting partisan political advantage over this sacred Australian rite, Burke appears to have willingly sacrificed a mass-citizenship ceremony in Western Sydney for the greater glory of the Australian Labor Party.

By holding the unusual event, the Department of Home Affairs minister was already hitting a sour note with Australians.

What Labor is selling as altruistic, looks a lot like them cheapening citizenship ceremonies to serve their own self-interests.

Burke is now being accused of abusing the ceremony for the purpose of saving Labor’s thinly held marginal seats in at least three electorates.

Federal Independent Member for Fowler, Dai Le, revealed she was excluded from the mass citizenship ceremony.

Her opponent, Labor candidate Tu Le wasn’t and benefited politically from the free campaign exposure.

The code prohibits “candidates for election, who currently don’t hold office, from receiving official invites.”

Electoral candidates are also prohibited from being included as official guests or being given a VIP seat.

I couldn’t find evidence confirming whether Tu Le was at the event by invitation, or there of her own accord.

Labor initially defended excluding Dai Le on a loose interpretation of the code of conduct.

They said, Dai Le wasn’t invited, because the mass citizenship event wasn’t held in her locality.

This is despite a large portion of the new citizens potentially being from Dai Le’s electorate.

Labor’s Home Affairs department then back-tracked claiming Dai Le had been invited, insinuating the Independent MP was lying.

Labor claimed Dai Le had “boycotted” the event.

Answering Labor, and their subsequent insults, Dai Le firmly told Sky News, this was a lie.

She never received an invitation.

Countering Burke’s attacks in a lengthy FB post, Dai Le asserted, “His claim that he invited me but I “boycotted” the event is a flat-out lie.

“How could I have “boycotted” something I wasn’t even invited to?”

Slamming the Labor Home Affairs minister, she added, “I feel for the new citizens who had their important day turned into a political campaign event by the Minister.

“They missed out on the opportunity to become citizens of this country in a local ceremony, surrounded by the people they love.

“Instead, they were used as political pawns, all because the Minister chose to put the interests of his election campaign above the significance of this moment for them.”

Highlighting the difference between being political and practicing civics, Dai Le said, “For the Labor Government to politicise something as important and meaningful as a citizenship ceremony is appalling.”

“At the end of the day,” Dai Le wrote on X, citizenship ceremonies should be about the people, not political parties.

James Patterson, the LNP’s spokesman for Home Affairs, remarked, these are the “dying days of a desperate government.”

It’s “extraordinary for Home Affairs Department citizenship ceremonies to ram through 12,000 citizenships, days before the election is called.”

This looks like Labor is trying to stack the electorate.

In a response, Burke, with a smirk, claims he did nothing wrong.

Gaslighting critics, he told them to “have a bit of patriotism.”

Covering the saga, the mighty Peta Credlin described Burke’s tactics as “sheer politicking.”

Mayor of Fairfield, Frank Carbone agreed, stating “it couldn’t be anything but politicking.”

“This is a government that doesn’t believe in Australia Day,” he added.

So, their concern for helping new citizens take the oath to Australia, is suspect.

Especially, since it seems that “only card-carrying Labor party members were allowed through the door.

“It was a catwalk for Labor candidates.”

WATCH:

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

“The order rightly calls out the Muslim Brotherhood’s subterfuge and ideology as ‘irreconcilable with foundational American principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’”
By
by Rod LampardDec 18, 2025
Theology Has Public Consequences

Theology Has Public Consequences

"Theology does not remain private; it works itself out in culture, institutions, and public life."
By
by Staff WriterDec 17, 2025
Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

“By supporting Kirralie, you’re really supporting every single Australian who wants to speak up in the future. This is especially so for women, because when one woman is punished for this, thousands of women are made silent.”
By
by Rod LampardDec 17, 2025
We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

Australia does not need race-based antisemitism laws; it needs a pro-Australian legal framework that applies equally to all and punishes harmful conduct regardless of who commits it or who the victim is.
By
by Ben DavisDec 17, 2025
From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

“Anyone who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ‘merely relative,’ is asking you not to believe him. So don’t!”
By
by Rod LampardDec 16, 2025
Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

"Rules are not enough. You also need to ensure that your country is full of people who are willing to follow those rules. And in that very important respect, Australia has clearly failed."
By
by Staff WriterDec 16, 2025
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.