Image

Javier Milei Slams the UN for Ditching Freedom for Socialism, Calls “Lockdowns a Crime Against Humanity!”

"Applying more socialism to cure the consequences of socialism only deepens the problem."

Javier Milei’s United Nations (UN) smackdown will rate as one of the Argentine President’s finest moments.

Milei’s first speech before the General Assembly held little back.

The chainsaw wielding Libertarian took a proverbial axe to the ideological weeds choking the life out of the UN’s original mandate.

Castigating the UN for abandoning freedom in favour of socialism, Milei rejected Project 2030, stating, Argentina will not participate in “the UN’s promotion of collectivism.”

The 2030 project is socialism.

This once liberty-centric organisation, Milei asserted, has replaced the co-operation of Nation States protecting God-given freedoms, and the right to life, with, “a model of supranational government of international bureaucrats who seek to impose a certain way of life on the citizens of the world.” 

Project 2030, and The Summit of the Future, he added, “is nothing other than the deepening of this tragic course the UN has adopted.”

Such as the UN’s plan to “define a new social contract on a global scale, redoubling the commitments of the 2030 Agenda.”

The project is “socialist in nature,” Milei argued.

Project 2030 undermines “the sovereignty of nation states and violate people’s right to life, liberty and property.”

Applying more socialism to cure the consequences of socialism only “deepens the problem,” he protested.

“World history,” the Argentine President declared, “shows that the only way to guarantee prosperity is by limiting the power of the monarch.”

This coexists with, “guaranteeing equality before the law, defending the right to life, liberty, and property of individuals.”

The UN has become a multi-tentacled platform for tyranny.

Quoting Isaiah 2:4, Milei pointed to the Biblical foundations of the United Nations, stating that the UN’s early success was being negated by a mutating bureaucratic structure.

The UN, he continued, had “stopped watching over the principles outlined in its founding declaration.”

What was once a “shield to protect the Kingdom of Men was transformed into a multi-tentacled Leviathan.”

The UN, he chided, “no longer pursues peace,” it imposes an ideological agenda on its members.

For instance, “the adoption of agenda 2030 obeys privileged interests.”

The UN’s role is distorted.

Milei then accused the UN of ditching “the principles outlined in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.”

This, he said, had “distorted the role of this institution, and put it on the wrong path.”

The organisation “born to defend human rights, has been one of the main promoters of the systematic violation of freedom.”

C0V1D-19 “lockdowns, for example, should be considered a crime against humanity.”

He also took the UN to task for elevating murderous dictatorships to the human rights council.

This house, Milei thundered, put “Cuba and Venezuela on the HRC without question.”

This “same house that claims to defend women’s rights, puts countries that punish their women for showing their skin, on the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women.

“This same house,” Milei continued, has “systematically voted against the State of Israel, the only country in the Middle East defending liberal democracy.

“All while demonstrating a total inability to respond to the scourge of terrorism.”

The WEF is leading the World astray.

Then there’s the issue of the UN promoting “collectivist policies,” that turn countries into “perpetual debtors” enslaved to the “agenda of global elites.”

Here Milei described the World Economic Forum’s tutelage as useless.

Ridiculous policies such as “Net Zero” and advocacy of Malthusian eugenics “harm, above all, poor countries.”

Implying that high abortion rates “announced a bleak future,” the Argentine President scolded the General Assembly for advancing “sexual and reproductive rights, when the birth rate of Western countries is plummeting.”

The UN is failing, Milei concluded.

“They’re losing credibility.

“It is powerless to provide solutions to the real global conflicts, such as the aberrant Russian invasion of Ukraine.

“Instead of facing these conflicts, the UN invests time and effort in imposing on poor countries the WEF’s agenda.

The organisation is too busy “dictating what, how and they should produce, with whom to associate, what they should eat, and what they should believe.”

Going Woke broke the UN.

To this Milei warned, “we are at the end of a cycle.”

“Collectivism and moral posturing, of the woke agenda , have collided with reality and no longer have credible solutions to offer to the real problems of the world.”

In sum, the UN went woke, now it’s going broke.

“We cannot,” he insisted, “persist in the error by doubling down on an agenda that has failed.

“We in Argentina have already seen with our own eyes what lies at the end of this path of envy and sad passions: poverty, brutalization, anarchy and a fatal absence of freedom.

“Argentina will not support any policy that involves the restriction of individual freedoms, or of trade.”

Nor any policy, that “violates the natural rights of individuals, no matter who promotes it or how much consensus that institution has.”

Offering hope, President Milei said, “We invite all the nations of the free world to join us, not only in dissenting from this pact, but in creating a new agenda for this noble institution: the agenda of freedom.

“May God bless the Argentines and all the citizens of the world, and may the forces of heaven be with us.”

Amen!

A worthy footnote.

Javier Milei’s speech puts out all the right punches.

Every bit of his smackdown of the General Assembly is consistent with his criticisms of the WEF, and Neo-Marxism, delivered in January at Davos.

There Milei told the world, “Do not let yourselves be intimidated by the political caste or by the parasites that live off the State.

“Do not surrender to a political class that only wants to perpetuate itself in power and maintain its privileges.

“Do not give in to the advance of the State.

“The State is not the solution.

“The State is the problem itself.

“Viva la Libertad!”

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.