Image

“Compelled Speech”: Canadian Pastor Arrested for Refusing to Issue Court-Ordered Apology

"Pastor Reimer was issued a court-ordered directive requiring him to issue a written apology after opposing a 'Drag Queen Story Time' event for children."

A Calgary pastor has been arrested after refusing to comply with a court-ordered directive requiring him to issue a written apology to a public librarian for “hurting her feelings” after protesting a “Drag Queen Story Time” event for children — a ruling supporters describe as an example of state-compelled speech.

Derek Reimer, a street preacher and leader of Mission 7 Ministries, was taken into custody on December 3 after missing a deadline to submit the apology letter, which had been imposed as part of a conditional sentence related to his protests against the drag-queen events for children at Calgary Public Library branches.

Reimer gained attention in 2023 after attending and verbally protesting several “Reading With Royalty” events. He was arrested multiple times during that period, although some initial charges, including mischief and causing a disturbance, were later dismissed or resulted in acquittals.

In a separate case connected to subsequent incidents, Reimer was convicted of criminal harassment and four counts of breaching bail conditions. The court sentenced him to a 12-month conditional sentence, commonly referred to as house arrest, followed by two years of probation. Among the enumerated terms of the sentencing order was a requirement that he write and submit a formal apology letter to a library manager involved in the matter.

Reimer refused to comply with the apology order, stating that being compelled by the government to express remorse violates his freedoms of conscience, religion, and expression as protected under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

According to LifeSite News, Reimer told local media that issuing an apology would require him to admit fault, saying that to be “sorry” is to acknowledge that “you’re wrong” or that you have made a “mistake.” He explained that he informed the court he relied on his “freedom of conscience and a thorough study and my understanding of it, mixed with freedom of expression and religion” to argue why he could not comply. According to Reimer, his submissions outlined his deeply held religious beliefs and why writing the apology would violate his conscience.

Reimer also claimed that during his court appearance, Justice Karen Molle repeatedly interrupted him and did not allow him to fully present his arguments. “She was interrupting me many times, even before I started preaching; she didn’t want to hear me,” he said.

He further stated that his probation officer had written that one of the goals of his case was to “break down his traditional thoughts about the LGBTQ community,” a point Reimer said the judge dismissed as “irrelevant.” Reimer argued that this created a conflict of interest, noting that his probation officer’s office displayed pride flags and was supportive of LGBTQ causes, yet the officer had influence over how the apology should be written.

Reimer told the court he would not apologise based on what he described as a “fabricated narrative” that he had intimidated the librarian. He said the librarian never used the word “intimidated,” but reported feeling “anxious, upset, and threatened” because she interpreted Reimer’s comments about the program as referring to “pervert grooming sessions.” Reimer said he never used the word “pedophile” and that his lawyer confirmed he had not called the librarian a pedophile.

After missing the court-ordered submission deadline, authorities ruled that Reimer had breached the conditions of his sentence. He was arrested by Calgary police on December 3 and now faces the possibility of having his conditional sentence revoked, which could result in incarceration or the imposition of stricter probation terms.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Final 130 Christian Children Freed After Month in Islamist Captivity in Nigeria

Final 130 Christian Children Freed After Month in Islamist Captivity in Nigeria

"Armed 'bandits' took 315 students and 12 staff members from Papiri’s St Mary's Catholic School captive in late November."
By
by Rod LampardJan 17, 2026
A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

"By refusing to name its own moral foundations, the state undermines its ability to openly distinguish between belief systems that can coexist within its legal and moral order and those that fundamentally conflict with them. A society that cannot articulate its core moral commitments cannot coherently defend them."
By
by Staff WriterJan 16, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.