Image

Australians Could Face Jail Under New Misinformation Bill, Legal Experts Warn

"The Australian people should be very concerned..."

Legal experts are sounding the alarm on Labor’s proposed Misinformation and Disinformation Bill, warning Australians could face jail time if the new legislation is passed.

Under the bill, citizens who fail to cooperate with government investigations into so-called “misinformation” could find themselves behind bars.

Radio host Ben Fordham revealed on 2GB that the Communications Minister would be empowered to order public hearings and investigations targeting misinformation on digital platforms.

Although the hearings would not apply directly to individual social media users, those affiliated with social media companies and digital platforms would be held accountable.

Failure to attend a hearing without a valid excuse could land people in jail, Fordham explained.

Fordham also cited media lawyer Justin Quill, who told The Daily Telegraph that the proposed changes open up a dangerous “Pandora’s box.” Quill expressed deep concern about the government’s push to control public debate and potentially penalize those who don’t toe the line.

“The Australian people should be very concerned about the government’s attempts to curate public discussion and potentially punish those who step out of line,” Quill warned.

Critics argue the bill could have chilling effects on free speech, placing too much power in the hands of the government to determine what qualifies as misinformation.

“The legislation defines misinformation to mean anything that is reasonable, verifiable as false, misleading or deceptive, but by whose standards?” Quill asked.

Fordham described the bill as a “disgraceful attack on free speech,” saying, “its aim is to intimidate and it should be stopped.”

He’s not wrong. The bill is an affront to the “democracy” Australia pretends to pride itself on. The fear of wrong-speak will end public debate, prevent people from challenging power, and stop the vulnerable from speaking up in the face of injustice.

The past few years should make everyone wary of giving the government the authority to define truth and punish those who dare to question their “official” narrative.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

You can't police what you can't coherently define.
By
by Ben DavisDec 18, 2025
Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

“The order rightly calls out the Muslim Brotherhood’s subterfuge and ideology as ‘irreconcilable with foundational American principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’”
By
by Rod LampardDec 18, 2025
Theology Has Public Consequences

Theology Has Public Consequences

"Theology does not remain private; it works itself out in culture, institutions, and public life."
By
by Staff WriterDec 17, 2025
Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

“By supporting Kirralie, you’re really supporting every single Australian who wants to speak up in the future. This is especially so for women, because when one woman is punished for this, thousands of women are made silent.”
By
by Rod LampardDec 17, 2025
We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

Australia does not need race-based antisemitism laws; it needs a pro-Australian legal framework that applies equally to all and punishes harmful conduct regardless of who commits it or who the victim is.
By
by Ben DavisDec 17, 2025
From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

“Anyone who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ‘merely relative,’ is asking you not to believe him. So don’t!”
By
by Rod LampardDec 16, 2025
Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

"Rules are not enough. You also need to ensure that your country is full of people who are willing to follow those rules. And in that very important respect, Australia has clearly failed."
By
by Staff WriterDec 16, 2025
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.