Image

Australian Pro-Life Advocate Wins Academic Freedom Case Against Pro-Abortion Activists

“I’m doing this for our freedoms, for all Australians who are sick and tired of the bullying and the harassment of the radical left who expect us all to comply with their Woke religion.”

Australian pro-life advocacy has chalked up a win against anti-life activism.

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) ruled in favour of mother, professor, and preborn advocate, Dr. Joanna Howe’s right to research the controversial subject without harassment.

A victim of “mass reporting,” Howe took Adelaide University, and its Woke workplace bullying to the FWC.

The reason?

Howe has faced six disruptive internal investigations in five years.

Each one was sparked by TikTok abortion activists not connected to the University.

Despite being cleared six times, Adelaide Uni enabled the attempted political hijacking of her work by entertaining the seemingly well-coordinated anti-life assault.

The final straw was Adelaide Uni demanding that Dr. Howe, an Oxford-educated professor, get re-educated.

Without just cause, they ordered her to undergo anti-bias training.

In challenging the attacks on her character, and professional reputation, Dr. Howe told The Australian, the fight wasn’t just for her academic freedom, it was for all Australians.

“I’m doing this for our freedoms, for all Australians who are sick and tired of the bullying and the harassment of the radical left who expect us all to comply with their Woke religion.”

Ruling on the matter in early August, the FWC handed Dr. Howe back the right to research.

As highlighted by Samuel Hartwich from the Daily Declaration, this includes a defence of free speech, and Dr. Howe’s right to speak freely about abortion.

The “confidential settlement” lifts, what she called “unfair corrective actions imposed upon her by Adelaide Uni.”

Thanking her legal team, Harmers Workplace Lawyers, the pro-life professor wrote, “This is an important victory for academic freedom and free speech.”

A joint public statement shared within the same Instagram post said, “The University has accepted the FWC’s recommendation for the University not to require Professor Howe to comply with the corrective actions, and that no further action will be taken in this matter.”

Both Dr. Howe, and the University “have agreed on a process regarding the investigation of complaints moving forward.”

Adelaide Uni expressed support for academic freedom in the statement, citing its “Enterprise Agreement 2023–2025 and its Freedom of Speech and Academic Freedom Policy.”

While Dr. Howe’s win is a significant smackdown of far-left cancel culture, she says there’s more to do.

Case in point is Queensland Labor’s latest appeal to voters, promising more access to the violent termination of life in the womb.

Although Dr. Howe’s legal battle has been won, there’s a war being waged against the unborn, and those who speak out on their behalf.

“I know this firsthand,” she wrote in an update on her website, “because of my experience as a scholar who is publicly critical of laws permitting abortion through all nine months of pregnancy in Australia.

“This has resulted in a sustained and concerted public campaign by pro-abortion activists and online trolls weaponising the complaints mechanism of my university against me,” she added.

Reflecting on the win, and the long road ahead, Dr. Howe wrote, “I’m acutely aware of the tens of thousands of Australians who do not feel free to express themselves publicly or in their workplace for fear of repercussions.”

Resolute, she has written to Professor David Lloyd, Chair of Universities Australia, asking for Universities to adjust how they process complaints from outside the academy.

Dr. Howe is requesting reform.

Her proposal is for Unis to “mandatorily dismiss complaints which are made vexatiously or in bad faith about the research or conduct of academics,” such as mass reporting.

Dr. Howe’s letter coincides with an online petition to save freedom of speech, preserve diversity of opinion, and reject cancel culture. The petition has been signed by almost 3,000 people.

Those looking to support Dr. Howe, and her important work, which includes fighting censorship of opposing viewpoints, and exposing the true face of the abortion industry, should sign her petition here.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.