Image

Another Australian MP Breaks With Totalitarianism in a Bold Stand for Freedom

"Davies, and her diverse, but like-minded supporters within the ranks, are putting themselves and their careers between the public and the rise of totalitarianism."

Australian MP, Tanya Davies is among a small section of New South Wales politicians defending the rights of the constituency.

The LNP member for Mulgoa is putting together a private bill that will ban mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations.

Davies explained to the ABC that any proposed “no jab, no job” policy is an “attack” on the people of NSW and a form of “discrimination”.’

Predicting the inevitable political fallout, Davies said, the LNP “government needs urgently to pull back on this one area of forcing vaccines upon people, or it is just going to be a blood bath at the next election.”

Other consequences of such a policy, she said, include “a wide range of liability and unfair dismissals.”

“No person,” Davies asserted, “should lose their job if they do not get vaccinated. A person may not be vaccinated for any number of medical, ethical, or religious reasons.”

Davies is backed by NSW Counter Terrorism Minister Anthony Roberts and Liberal MP Nathaniel Smith.

The private members bill was triggered by NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian’s “no jab, no pay” decree for construction workers.

Davies told 2GB radio, the order was a “step too far;” adding that “The government has misread this issue and needs to urgently go back to the drawing board and make these changes. They’re basically appearing and acting like a dictator.”

The member from Mulgoa has wide support from the public, but not the majority support of her colleagues.

The Daily Telegraph reported that Davies took heat from “ministers in the Liberal party for speaking out about mandatory vaccinations.”

News.com elaborated on the clash, describing Davies opposition as a declaration of war.

According to the report Davies was “ganged up on” in a zoom meeting, with “some MPs claiming that the Premier “cut Davies off, and interrupted her.”

While other MPs stated that the meeting was “nothing extraordinary, people just disagreed with her.”

News.com asked Attorney-General Mark Speakman about the incident, he declined to comment.

However, Speakman is on record with NCA NewsWire saying that “any discouragement of vaccination was a “dereliction of duty.”

Harsh criticism for Davies also came from State deputy Premier, John Barilaro.

Barilaro, according to the Sydney Morning Herald, ‘denounced the bill in a reply-all email to Coalition MPs.’

Barilaro’s email defending mandatory COVID vaccinations, and subsequently government taking control over the health decisions of their constituents, disingenuously claimed that:

 “The only way we will get out of this latest outbreak is through vaccination, meaning we can all have freedom again.”

He adds,

“it was an individual’s choice to get the jab and that no one was forced to do it, but added “that comes at a price. That means your [the vaccine hesitant’s] freedoms will be curtailed.”

Translation: “the covaxx isn’t mandatory, but it is.”

In his public attack on Davies, Barilaro appears to have glossed over the fact that vaccinated and unvaccinated alike were both receptors and transmitters of COVID-19.

Covaxxes only reduce the severity of COVID symptoms. The current varieties neither stop infection nor transmission.

Tanya Davies is a mother of two, and the former minister for women.

This isn’t her first political fight.

She opposed Berejiklian’s poor procedural handling of an ambush, extreme leftist abortion bill rushed through the NSW parliament following the last state election.

Davies was also part of a leadership challenge that Barilaro and the now NSW health minister “bully” Brad Hazzard strongly opposed.

Proof that both Barilaro and Hazzard are no fans of the outspoken female MP.

Davies has proven to be consistent in her quest to preserve life, civil rights, and civil liberties.

Davies, and her diverse, but like-minded supporters within the ranks, are putting themselves and their careers between the public and the rise of totalitarianism.

For this, they deserve our full support.

Along with Mark Latham, George Christensen, and Craig Kelly, these members are true representatives of the people.

They are serving us, not demanding that we serve them.

You can follow T.D on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

Tanya Davies’ speeches can be found here.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Far From Over: 98% of Antisemitism Bill Still Stands, Freedom Advocates Issue Warning

Far From Over: 98% of Antisemitism Bill Still Stands, Freedom Advocates Issue Warning

"The Australian Government’s proposed antisemitism legislation remains largely unchanged, with only a small portion removed following public backlash."
By
by Staff WriterJan 19, 2026
Echoes of Eden

Echoes of Eden

"The enemies of Christ infiltrated the garden of Christendom and asked its heirs, 'Hath God said?' We ate. And today, we are suffering the consequences."
By
by Ben DavisJan 19, 2026
Final 130 Christian Children Freed After Month in Islamist Captivity in Nigeria

Final 130 Christian Children Freed After Month in Islamist Captivity in Nigeria

"Armed 'bandits' took 315 students and 12 staff members from Papiri’s St Mary's Catholic School captive in late November."
By
by Rod LampardJan 17, 2026
A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

"By refusing to name its own moral foundations, the state undermines its ability to openly distinguish between belief systems that can coexist within its legal and moral order and those that fundamentally conflict with them. A society that cannot articulate its core moral commitments cannot coherently defend them."
By
by Staff WriterJan 16, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.