Image

Airport security can take your phone or laptop, demand your passwords, and make a copy of the contents, says lawyer.

In an interview on the ABC’s Law Report, lawyer Zaahir Edries, revealed the Australian Border Force has the power to seize your mobile phone or laptop, search the contents, and even make copies of everything that’s on your smart devices. Mr Edries told host Damien Carrick, “What it means is that anything you have on your phone, as a passenger, is open to scrutiny or interrogation by ABF officers.” While Mr Edries admits empirical evidence indicating how often such searches take place is “not quite collated as well as civil liberties organisations might want,” from an anecdotal perspective, he believes……

In an interview on the ABC’s Law Report, lawyer Zaahir Edries, revealed the Australian Border Force has the power to seize your mobile phone or laptop, search the contents, and even make copies of everything that’s on your smart devices.

Mr Edries told host Damien Carrick, “What it means is that anything you have on your phone, as a passenger, is open to scrutiny or interrogation by ABF officers.”

While Mr Edries admits empirical evidence indicating how often such searches take place is “not quite collated as well as civil liberties organisations might want,” from an anecdotal perspective, he believes it happens quite frequently.

“Our organisation will have referrals for assistance of people who have been stopped, they believe unjustly, at the border and asked questions that they thought were unreasonable, had their phones removed, laptops removed, USB sticks and those sorts of things in a time where they believed that there was no reason to do so. And that’s probably something I see or hear of every few weeks,” he said.

But what happens if you refuse to hand over the pass-codes and passwords for your smart devices? According to Mr Edries, your items will either be seized or taken away until the contents is copied.

“The items are either confiscated or they’re taken away for some period of time and then they’re returned assuming that the phone or the laptop has been copied or images been made of the hard drive or whatever the case may be,” Mr Edries explained.

Australia is not alone. In the year 2017, the United States government data revealed there were about 30,000 searches of electronic devices at the border, according to Adam Schwartz, senior lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

“We have some clients who refused” to hand over their passwords, Mr Schwartz said. “And as a result their phones were confiscated. One of our clients, a successful businessman from Texas–who actually does security work for the US government selling them surveillance cameras–they took his phone and they kept it for 11 months.”

Such searches in US have recently been challenged with one district court suggesting they potentially breach the Fourth Amendment, which protects people from unlawful searches and seizures.

Last week a video (see below) was uploaded to Facebook in which a man, identified only as Nathan, detailed his experience with authorities at Sydney Airport. According to the man, authorities spent 90 minutes searching through, or making copies of, both his laptop and smart-phone.

Benjamin Franklin once said, “Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security, deserves neither and loses both.”

So, how do you feel about this? Is it necessary for the protection and security of Australia or is it an invasion of freedom and privacy?

WATCH:

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Kathleen Kennedy Steps Down: Will Lucasfilm Recapture the Magic Without the DEI Drama?

Kathleen Kennedy Steps Down: Will Lucasfilm Recapture the Magic Without the DEI Drama?

“Although absent from Forbes’ list of Kennedy foibles, few incidents illustrate them as blatantly as the firing of conservative Gina Carano.”
By
by Rod LampardJan 20, 2026
Far From Over: 98% of Antisemitism Bill Still Stands, Freedom Advocates Issue Warning

Far From Over: 98% of Antisemitism Bill Still Stands, Freedom Advocates Issue Warning

"The Australian Government’s proposed antisemitism legislation remains largely unchanged, with only a small portion removed following public backlash."
By
by Staff WriterJan 19, 2026
Echoes of Eden

Echoes of Eden

"The enemies of Christ infiltrated the garden of Christendom and asked its heirs, 'Hath God said?' We ate. And today, we are suffering the consequences."
By
by Ben DavisJan 19, 2026
Final 130 Christian Children Freed After Month in Islamist Captivity in Nigeria

Final 130 Christian Children Freed After Month in Islamist Captivity in Nigeria

"Armed 'bandits' took 315 students and 12 staff members from Papiri’s St Mary's Catholic School captive in late November."
By
by Rod LampardJan 17, 2026
A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

"By refusing to name its own moral foundations, the state undermines its ability to openly distinguish between belief systems that can coexist within its legal and moral order and those that fundamentally conflict with them. A society that cannot articulate its core moral commitments cannot coherently defend them."
By
by Staff WriterJan 16, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.