Image

YouTube Censors Podcast Discussing Big Tech Censorship

If Big Media and Big Tech aren’t protecting an approved globalist narrative, why would Reuters not allow an accomplished, high-profile doctor the right to balance out an attack on his character, and his medical views?

A Podcast episode I had contributed to last week has been cancelled by YouTube.

The Prepare Defend Lead podcast, ‘A Brave New World,’ was removed by the Silicon Valley technocrats after a review of its content.

Podcast host, Joe Prim posted the short violation notice to his Instagram page.

YouTube claims the conversation breached their ‘medical misinformation policy.’

This is despite no medical advice being given, nor prescribed. The claim is false.

Joe invited me onto his show to give his American audience an insight into the rampant, random use of lockdowns against the people, in the government’s “fight against COVID-19” in Australia. I did just that.

Our conversation also covered censorship, such as the gagging of COVID treatment advocates Dr. Simone Gold, and Dr. Perrie Kody; along with COVaxx dissenters, including mRNA inventor Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Peter McCullough, and evolutionary biologist, Bret Weinstein.

Recall that Bret Weinstein was demonetised by YouTube last month.

This was because the evolutionary biologist gave a voice to medical professionals who haven’t been afraid to confront inept government, inconsistency, double standards, and totalitarian health bureaucrats alike.

More information on that can be found on the Caldron Pool website here, here, and here. The first and last in this list are articles Twitter banned, suspending Caldron Pool’s Twitter account for seven days.

Additionally, there’s an obvious misinformation campaign against Dr. Robert Malone. He’s been accused of inventing the title “inventor of mRNA vaccines.”

Malone and Weinstein were also the targets of a “fact-checking” operation initiated by Reuters. The news organisation challenged Malone’s assertions that COVID-19 “vaccines” were Cytotoxic.

Reuters “fact-checkers” never bothered to check the facts with him.

Put another way, big media fact-checked medical information, without consulting the medical professional who first provided it.

There is no recourse for an opposing point of view that would dispute Reuters defending an approved narrative.

Protecting the narrative displaces individual rights. Namely habeas corpus, and the right to due process.

If legacy media “fact-checkers” say Dr. Malone is guilty of spreading ‘medical misinformation’, he’s guilty.

In another sampling of censorship, an official GBN video featuring a 4-minute reasoned argument against the COVaxxing of children didn’t last a week.

YouTube removed Neil Oliver’s astute opposition. Justifying the cancelation as tenable, declaring GBN to be guilty of ‘violating community standards. I.e.: ‘spreading medical misinformation.’

If Big Media and Big Tech aren’t protecting an approved globalist narrative, why would Reuters not allow an accomplished, high-profile doctor the right to balance out an attack on his character, and his medical views?

Why else would YouTube ban all content that ‘contradicts the World Health Organisation’s medical information about COVID-19; or local authorities’ – in other words the pseudo-theoslogos of health bureaucrats?

As is plainly stated in YT’s policy information:

Even if content doesn’t contradict the COVID party-line, commentary on views that do, is still a “gaolable” offence.

Oliver’s video has since been reinstated. It’s unlikely Joe Prim’s Podcast episode will be treated the same.

Rather than gag justifiable dissent, all forms of questioning and debate, the over-Lords running the show should turn their sites on government propaganda.

Lies that have no basis in fact. Like this ‘disgusting’ example from Australia:

Governments and their enablers, don’t seem to realise how much their use of the stick entrenches opposition to their dodgy “vaccine.”

I’m less inclined than ever to recommend anyone get it; let alone advise family to do so.

Fact: emotional manipulation is psychological abuse.

For all of the achievements of the modern era humanity remains conditioned by the corruption of the human heart.

Society hasn’t progressed all that far from Antiquity.

The Ancient Near East: “You not worshipping this idol, is the reason for all these disasters. If you care about others, you’ll bow down to it!”

2021: “You not worshipping the COVaxx, is the reason for all these lockdowns. If you care about others, you’ll bow down to it!”

Same thing, different costume.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

"By refusing to name its own moral foundations, the state undermines its ability to openly distinguish between belief systems that can coexist within its legal and moral order and those that fundamentally conflict with them. A society that cannot articulate its core moral commitments cannot coherently defend them."
By
by Staff WriterJan 16, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026
UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

"Free communication has always posed a problem for those who seek to centralise authority. Open platforms like X allow claims to be challenged, narratives to be contested, and power to be scrutinised. That is precisely why they become targets when governments feel uncomfortable, embarrassed, or threatened."
By
by Staff WriterJan 12, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.