Image

Woe to us if we are ever governed by the whim of lawyers and activists instead of the rule of law

The closing remark from The Australian’s Janet Albrechtsen, in writing on the Australian Securities & Investments Commission’s (ASIC) quest for more judicial power through “new fairness laws”, made a pointed case about the danger of being ruled by fiat and whim of the bureaucratic caste. Citing NSW Chief Justice Tom Bathurst, Albrechtsen argued that vague edicts – based on ill-defined and poorly understood laws that we imagine reflect “the moral conscience of society” – mean “we will be ruled by lawyers not the rule of law.’ In other words, the danger before us is a society enslaved to an interpreter’s……

The closing remark from The Australian’s Janet Albrechtsen, in writing on the Australian Securities & Investments Commission’s (ASIC) quest for more judicial power through “new fairness laws”, made a pointed case about the danger of being ruled by fiat and whim of the bureaucratic caste.

Citing NSW Chief Justice Tom Bathurst, Albrechtsen argued that vague edicts – based on ill-defined and poorly understood laws that we imagine reflect “the moral conscience of society” – mean “we will be ruled by lawyers not the rule of law.’ In other words, the danger before us is a society enslaved to an interpreter’s ability to interpret vague or ambiguous laws; meaning in a nutshell that subjective moralism, not objective morality, as handed down to English common law through Biblical Christianity, rules the day.

Albrechtsen labelled ASIC’s push for “new [fairness] laws” a case of “bureaucrats expanding their unelected empires.” Adding to this, Albrechtsen stated, Bathurst “warned that lawyers who favoured these kinds of laws could lose sight of whether the laws actually worked.” This is because fairness isn’t easily defined and “people need clear, precise laws so they can identify, in advance, whether a particular act or arrangement will be [in] breach of [those] laws.”

In sum, Albrechtsen called for these new “fairness” laws to be rejected. For the reason, that implementing laws based on subjective whims, and uncertain notions about the current moral consciousness of society, leads to government overreach, and oppression or the ability to oppress. This is achieved through reckless, reactionary and unclear laws. The kinds of laws, that Albrechtsen accurately states, only serves the unelected bureaucratic caste and their socio-political interests. Simply put: “laws based on an ambiguous idea of fairness is bad for democracy.” Ergo, these should be rejected.

To understand how Albrechtsen’s closing remark applies to this broader context, it pays to look at how her broadside against ASIC’s apparent quest for more power, hits on an issue that not only applies to ASIC’s request for “new fairness laws”, but to the broader context of hostile activism, and the quest to appear virtuous under the banner of social justice warrior.

We the people, as a society of free men and women, bearing the duties and responsibilities that such freedom requires, will indeed rue the day where we, out of ignorance and complacency, find ourselves under the thumb of a bloated, virtue signalling bureaucracy, issuing gaol terms or death sentences for perceived crimes committed under ambiguous terms such as “love is love”, “hate speech”, “white privilege” and “micro-aggressions”.

To lean on Jean Bethke Elshtain and her paraphrasing of Vaclav Havel [i], “when human beings play God, the wreckage grows. In this mode, the human being finds himself in the “rut of totalitarian thought, where he is not his own and where he surrenders his own reason and conscience for the sake of another uninhabitable fiction! As long as that goal is served, it is not important whether we call that fiction “human well-being”, “socialism” or “peace”. He or she lives within a lie as the self is given over to the “social auto-totality” [i.e.: he or she becomes both victim of the system and its instrument]; identity is surrendered and responsibility falters. A totalitarian society counts on this, requires it.”

To expand upon Albrechtsen’s closing remarks, woe to us if we’re ever governed by this subjective man-made system of salvation and condemnation, where we are governed by the fiats and whims of lawyers, and hostile leftist activism, instead of the rule of law.

References:
[i] Vaclav Havel was a survivor. He participated in the resistance movement during the Soviet led, Warsaw Pact, and invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968. He was an anti-communist dissident and former president.
Albrechtsen, J. 2020, ‘Fairness’ The New Frontier For a Failing Regulator, The Australian, Wednesday 12th February.
Elshtain, J.B. 1995, Democracy On Trial, Basic Books
Havel, V. 1987, Living In Truth, Faber and Faber

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Hungary’s USAID Documentaries Aim to Expose Political Interference by “Progressive” NGOs

Hungary’s USAID Documentaries Aim to Expose Political Interference by “Progressive” NGOs

"A civilisational struggle is underway in the Western world. Those who uphold Christian traditional values must prevail over radical progressive forces that threaten our societies, families, and public safety. The future of Western civilisation is at stake," Orban said.
By
by Rod LampardNov 11, 2025
Olympics Set to Ban Transgender Athletes

Olympics Set to Ban Transgender Athletes

"The Olympics are reportedly preparing to ban all transgender athletes from female events after finding scientific evidence that being born male provides athletic advantages."
By
by Staff WriterNov 11, 2025
The Vanishing Bonds of Nationhood

The Vanishing Bonds of Nationhood

"The shared ancestry that once produced national solidarity has been diluted in the name of diversity, and the common faith that once provided moral coherence has been replaced with an ideology of expressive individualism."
By
by Staff WriterNov 10, 2025
Actor Zachary Levi Credits God for Faith-Fuelled Escape Out of Hollywood Hell

Actor Zachary Levi Credits God for Faith-Fuelled Escape Out of Hollywood Hell

“Hollywood had never been a healthy place for me,” he wrote. “I don’t know if it’s a healthy place for anyone.”
By
by Rod LampardNov 8, 2025
100-Year-Old WWII Veteran Says the Sacrifice “Wasn’t Worth the Result”

100-Year-Old WWII Veteran Says the Sacrifice “Wasn’t Worth the Result”

"Hundreds of my friends, and everyone else who gave their lives. For what? The country of today? No, I’m sorry, the sacrifice wasn’t worth the result we have now," he said.
By
by Staff WriterNov 8, 2025
You Watched As Young White Men Were Vilified — Now You’re Shocked You Don’t Have Their Respect?

You Watched As Young White Men Were Vilified — Now You’re Shocked You Don’t Have Their Respect?

Before you condemn these young men, ask yourself whether you’re really condemning the consequences of your own creation.
By
by Ben DavisNov 7, 2025
Why Modern Multiculturalism Dismantles the Civilization That Made It Possible

Why Modern Multiculturalism Dismantles the Civilization That Made It Possible

"Multiculturalism today is less about culture and more about religious and moral relativism: the belief that there is no ultimate truth, no objective or unchanging moral law to which we, as individuals or as a society, must conform."
By
by Ben DavisNov 7, 2025
Turkey Labels Christianity a Threat to National Security 

Turkey Labels Christianity a Threat to National Security 

"Up to 350 Christians have been booted out of the country since 2020."
By
by Rod LampardNov 6, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.