Image

Case Dismissed: The Washington Post gets away with inciting hate after labeling Covington school boys “racists”

Covington student, Nicholas Sandermann’s $250 million defamation case against The Washington Post was dismissed late last month, after a federal judge ruled that the Washington Post hadn’t slandered Sandermann in its reporting of the infamous, so-called “standoff” between himself and Native American, Nathan Phillips on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. Saurabh Sharma of the Dailycaller said the “judge threw out the case” saying that The Washington Post didn’t defame the Covington students, but were irresponsible with their use of “loose, figurative,” and “rhetorical hyperbole”. [i] This is despite The Washington Post, along with some Twitter users and others within……

Covington student, Nicholas Sandermann’s $250 million defamation case against The Washington Post was dismissed late last month, after a federal judge ruled that the Washington Post hadn’t slandered Sandermann in its reporting of the infamous, so-called “standoff” between himself and Native American, Nathan Phillips on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.

Saurabh Sharma of the Dailycaller said the “judge threw out the case” saying that The Washington Post didn’t defame the Covington students, but were irresponsible with their use of “loose, figurative,” and “rhetorical hyperbole”. [i]

This is despite The Washington Post, along with some Twitter users and others within the mainstream media, using short viral video clips of the event, to portray the MAGA hat-wearing school kids as racists.

Rollingstone, while acknowledging that the incident seemed to have been provoked by members of the Black Israelite movement, was also quick to draw the racist narrative around the Covington School students, stating, “the video is a disturbing and eerie echo of angry white mobs yelling at Black Americans for protesting Jim Crow-era discrimination.”[ii]

While Buzzfeed managed to steer around defaming the students, it’s obvious that Buzzfeed reporters shared similar conclusions. By using viral video clips from the event, they upheld the presumption of guilt, by inferring that racist claims made against the Catholic students we legitimate.

The initial Buzzfeed article made specific mention of the student’s ethnicity, pointing out that “nearly all were white and wearing pro-Trump gear, chanting at and mocking Native American, Nation Phillips on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.”[iii]

Buzzfeed also appears to have supported interpretations drawn from one of the videos of the students, which claimed that Sandermann was “smirking” in a “racist way” at Phillips, who was branded a peacemaker during the incident. Like many in the mainstream media, this was apparently enough proof for Buzzfeed to spread the newspeak narrative of white privilege, hate, oppression and racism: the Covington students were white, Christian, and Trump supporters, ergo they must also be racists.

Buzzfeed updated their original piece with a link to a video which shows “more context”, admitting that the incident “was more confusing than the viral clips made it seem”. Buzzfeed also reported that teen’s family will be appealing the decision to dismiss the case, with one of the family’s lawyers saying, “the law must protect innocent minors targeted by journalists publishing clickbait sensationalized news.”

The Washington Post, like many of the Left’s leaders on Twitter, did the equivalent of whipping the crowd up into a frenzy, handing them a lynch rope, then when the facts came to light, quietly slipped out the back door. Later to be dismissed from having to take any responsibility because of an appeal to freedom of speech, and literary license.

The case dismissal is good news for The Washington Post. The outcome could also be viewed as good news for the future of freedom of speech.

However, it’s doubtful that the reasons for this “win”, based on an appeal to first amendments rights and literary license, will be allowed as a defence for Pastors and Christian writers when producing literature that criticizes sin from a Biblically Christian perspective.

Especially when their publications involve proclaiming The Gospel in its unique redemptive critique of human sin such as greed, adultery, homosexuality, pride, envy, slander, idolatry – a critique now largely rejected and found “hateful” and “harmful” by the Left, because of its no questions asked embrace of the LGBT religion, Islamism and related regressive, progressive ideologies.

References:
[i] Sharma, S. 2019.  The Washington Post Won Its Case Against The Covington Catholic Kids, But A Federal Judge Had Some Choice Words For The Outlet, Daily Caller, 12th August, 2019
[ii] Wade, P. 2019. Judge Dismisses Covington Student’s Lawsuit Against ‘Washington Post’ RollingStone, 27th July, 2019
[iii] Reinstein, J. & Baer, S.K. 2019.  The MAGA Hat–Wearing Teens Who Taunted A Native American Elder Could Be Expelled Buzzfeed, 19th January, 2019.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Australian Government Faces Backlash for Exempting Politicians From New Insane Tax

Australian Government Faces Backlash for Exempting Politicians From New Insane Tax

"Experts warn that this could push Australians to sell investments, including homes, to cover the taxes, reducing the nation’s number of property owners and increasing the divide between an elite class of owners and a growing number of renters."
By
by Staff WriterMay 19, 2025
Clinton Slams Calls for More American Children, Says Immigrants Are the Solution

Clinton Slams Calls for More American Children, Says Immigrants Are the Solution

"The people who produce the most children in our country are immigrants, and they want to deport them."
By
by Staff WriterMay 19, 2025
The War on the Family Is a War on the Nation

The War on the Family Is a War on the Nation

"A society will only be as moral, honest, and stable as the average family."
By
by Staff WriterMay 19, 2025
Always the Colonizers, Never the Natives

Always the Colonizers, Never the Natives

"The message is that there is literally no place on Earth that white people can claim as a legitimate homeland. A white man is native to nowhere. He is indigenous to nowhere."
By
by Staff WriterMay 18, 2025
Is Political Cowardice Behind the Church Failing Fr. Calvin Robinson?

Is Political Cowardice Behind the Church Failing Fr. Calvin Robinson?

"...many consider the cancelled conservative Christian priest to be the victim of a campaign targeting him for his political views."
By
by Rod LampardMay 17, 2025
Rewarding Vandalism, Removing the Past

Rewarding Vandalism, Removing the Past

"This response effectively rewards unlawful behaviour, sending a message that persistent defacement will be met not with enforcement, but with capitulation."
By
by Staff WriterMay 16, 2025
Fallen Means and God: Women Pastors

Fallen Means and God: Women Pastors

"Just because God can work through these fallen means does not mean we should encourage it."
By
by Matthew LittlefieldMay 16, 2025
Snubbing the Bible Is a Conflation of Church and State, Actually

Snubbing the Bible Is a Conflation of Church and State, Actually

"By refusing to swear on the Bible—and thereby rejecting the symbolic acknowledgment of his God-given limitations—the Prime Minister ironically does precisely what he claims to avoid: he conflates church and state by absorbing spiritual and moral authority into his own office."
By
by Ben DavisMay 15, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.