Image

Supercharging Pakistan’s Blasphemy Laws Will Boost Their Abuse

"In 2009, six Christians were burned alive, 140 houses were destroyed, and hundreds of Christians have been displaced by mobs after an insult to Muhammad was perceived."

Pakistan supercharging its blasphemy laws is likely to increase false accusations, as blaspheming Muhammad is set to become as easy as insulting those who lived in Muhammad’s orbit.

Pakistan’s National Assembly (Lower House) voted on January 17, unanimously passing the Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act amendment, giving support to expanding the country’s current laws prohibiting politically incorrect speech.

Criticizing the warlord, religious icon, militant expansionist, and/or his borrowed theology, already comes with the death penalty, if not a hefty gaol term.

Under the new proposal, Article 298c’s death penalty for ‘blaspheming the Holy Prophet,’ would be applied to section 298-A, ‘disrespecting companions, and other sacred personalities.’

These include ‘Muhammad’s wives and family.’

Reasons for the bill?

The amendment’s backers said blasphemy of Muhammad promoted [domestic] “terrorism, and disruption in the country,” adding, blasphemy also “hurts people from all walks of life.”

This disruption, they argued, was something “Allah Almighty condemns in the Quran, saying mischief is a crime, more than a murder.”

Pakistan’s anti-free speech expansion pack came with the justification that the amendment was needed in order to end mob justice.

Authors of the bill said section 298-A’s “simple punishment” for insulting Muhammad’s entourage was too soft.

“Criminals” are not discouraged from “committing the same crime again,” they argued.

Equally, they blamed soft levels of punishment on the rise of vigilantism.

The bill reasoned, such simple punishment enraged Muslim mobs against those accused of blasphemy, the three-year minimum bailable sentence, and nominal fine needed to be harsher. All in order to stop increased Islamic violence against non-Muslims.

As reported by the New York Times, this violence often comes from the Muslim majority clashing with the Christian minority.

If, argued the amendment, ‘parliament is sincere to finish [domestic] terrorism and sectarianism, then it should change the punishment for anyone who uses derogatory remarks about [Muhammad’s, wives, family or companions] to the death penalty.’

Although Pakistan tends to imprison, and not execute citizens accused of insulting Islam, 70 people have been killed by mobs.

Quoting from stats obtained by the Catholic Register, in “2009 six Christians were burned alive, 140 houses were destroyed, and hundreds of Christians have been displaced by mobs after an insult to Muhammad was perceived.”

Persecuted Church monitor, Morning Star News said, “the legislation is expected to also pass unanimously in the Senate, and then it would require the president’s signature to become law.”

Opposing the amendments, Anglican Church of Pakistan Moderator/President Azad Marshall, told MSN, “The legislation is worrying.”

“Existing blasphemy laws have encouraged religious persecution for decades, and this new legislation is bound to exacerbate the problems for our people,” Marshall explained.

He then added, “The new amendments would only lead to more abuse.”

The logic behind the amendment to supercharge Pakistan’s blasphemy law is barbed.

The bill is a stealthy way of expanding a “convert, pay a tax, or die” mandate, which underhandly squashes Pakistan’s Christian community behind a cloak of emotional reasoning.

Aasia Bibi, as well as Shagufta and Shafqat Emmanuel, exemplify how these laws are being used to wage a jihad against Christians.

Another example is Christian, Samina Mushtaq.

Mushtaq, a widow, who works for Pakistan’s Civil Aviation Authority recalled how she recorded a video of a Muslim man threatening to “accuse her of blasphemy” if she didn’t break the law and “allow an unauthorised vehicle into the parking area of the cargo terminal at Karachi’s Jinnah International Airport.”

For Mushtaq, the recording posted on social media probably saved her life.

False accusations vis a vis the misuse of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws are about as infamous as the LGBT lawfare being blatantly waged against Christians in the West.

For those not paying attention: I’m referring to false justifications for vague, subjective laws strapped to the abusive politicisation of phobias, such as so-called Islamophobia, transphobia, and homophobia.

These laws are interlinked through the falsehoods of Woke intersectionality’s manipulative, “us vs. them” cognitive distortions.

Different political religion, same cult-like fanaticism.

Examples of the Woke Jihad against Christians in the West include Jack Phillips, Israel Folau, Matthew Grech, and now Australia’s Christian Schools.

The solution to mob justice is to outlaw mob justice, not further outlaw free speech, or water down freedom of religion.

To quote Amnesty International, “There is overwhelming evidence that Pakistan’s blasphemy laws violate human rights, and encourage people to take the law into their own hands.”

The argument, “we’re protecting Christians by making laws easier to falsely accuse them,” exposes the amendment’s pretence.

The proposal entrenches privileges for a protected political class, creating a supercharged “safe space” for Muslims.

Justifications for the amendment are a complete farce. Thus, the bill should be rejected.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
‘Treasonous Conspiracy’: Gabbard Drops Bombshell Intel Alleging Obama-Directed Coup Against Trump

‘Treasonous Conspiracy’: Gabbard Drops Bombshell Intel Alleging Obama-Directed Coup Against Trump

“These documents detail a treasonous conspiracy by officials at the highest levels of the Obama White House to subvert the will of the American people and try to usurp the President from fulfilling his mandate,” Gabbard said.
By
by Staff WriterJul 19, 2025
Melbourne Royal Show Apologises, Reinstates 108-Year-Old Bible Booth After Ban Backlash 

Melbourne Royal Show Apologises, Reinstates 108-Year-Old Bible Booth After Ban Backlash 

"To the Show’s credit, this is a complete turnaround from the contents of a rejection letter sent to Good News booth volunteers last November."
By
by Rod LampardJul 18, 2025
UK Petition to Track Child Sex Offender Demographics Hits 150K Signatures in 24 Hours

UK Petition to Track Child Sex Offender Demographics Hits 150K Signatures in 24 Hours

"Without this information, critical patterns may be missed, weakening efforts to prevent abuse and protect vulnerable children."
By
by Staff WriterJul 18, 2025
Fauci’s Pre-Emptive Pardon Faces Scrutiny Amid Autopen Abuse Allegations

Fauci’s Pre-Emptive Pardon Faces Scrutiny Amid Autopen Abuse Allegations

Fauci’s pardon is now at the center of a growing investigation into whether Biden’s staff exploited his cognitive decline to issue unauthorized clemencies using an autopen.
By
by Rod LampardJul 17, 2025
Matt Walsh Demands Answers in Epstein Case: “We Can’t Move On”

Matt Walsh Demands Answers in Epstein Case: “We Can’t Move On”

"We want those people to be dragged in front of us, weeping and begging for mercy. We want them exposed and humiliated and shamed and punished in the harshest and most painful way, because that's justice."
By
by Staff WriterJul 16, 2025
On Arresting Decline

On Arresting Decline

"Once decline is set in, then there is not really much that even the best leaders can do to stop it."
By
by Matthew LittlefieldJul 16, 2025
John MacArthur Enters Glory

John MacArthur Enters Glory

"This evening, his faith became sight."
By
by Staff WriterJul 15, 2025
Trump DOJ Dismisses Charges Against Doctor Who Defied Democrat COVID Mandates

Trump DOJ Dismisses Charges Against Doctor Who Defied Democrat COVID Mandates

"Dr. Moore gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so."
By
by Rod LampardJul 15, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.