Image

Trump Picks Critic of COVID Mandates to Lead NIH

"Bhattacharya is widely known for his criticisms of draconian government responses to COVID-19 and is co-author of The Great Barrington Declaration."

Dr Jay Bhattacharya, a prominent physician and Stanford professor has been nominated by President-Elect, Donald Trump, to replace Dr Francis Collins as the director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Bhattacharya is widely known for his criticisms of draconian government responses to COVID-19 and is co-author of The Great Barrington Declaration.

The declaration, published on October 4, 2020, called for protecting vulnerable populations—such as the elderly and infirm—through targeted measures like frequent testing and minimized exposure, while allowing low-risk groups to live normally and build immunity through natural infection.

The aim was to achieve herd immunity with minimal social and economic harm, prioritizing both public health and individual freedoms.

Bhattacharya’s stance was met with strong criticism at the time, particularly from progressive politicians, mainstream media, and even some Christian communities, not because his views were scientifically unfounded, but because his views clashed with dominant political narratives.

Dr. Collins, Bhattacharya’s predecessor, has recently faced scrutiny for his actions during the pandemic, with some describing him as the “most evil man in evangelicalism.”

Although Collins identifies as a Christian, he has been accused of undermining religious institutions during the crisis. Some claim he prioritized political objectives over the needs of faith communities, as detailed in Megan Basham’s book Shepherds for Sale. Basham alleges that the federal government, under Collins’s leadership, leveraged pastors to disseminate COVID-19 messaging.

He has also been accused of overseeing and endorsing abhorrent practices, including fetal experimentation, embryonic stem cell research, and transgender treatments for minors.

The appointment of Dr Bhattacharya no doubt marks a significant change that reflects a broader shift in the Overton window of public discourse and policy.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Final 130 Christian Children Freed After Month in Islamist Captivity in Nigeria

Final 130 Christian Children Freed After Month in Islamist Captivity in Nigeria

"Armed 'bandits' took 315 students and 12 staff members from Papiri’s St Mary's Catholic School captive in late November."
By
by Rod LampardJan 17, 2026
A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

"By refusing to name its own moral foundations, the state undermines its ability to openly distinguish between belief systems that can coexist within its legal and moral order and those that fundamentally conflict with them. A society that cannot articulate its core moral commitments cannot coherently defend them."
By
by Staff WriterJan 16, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.