Image

The Book That’s Making Many Evangelical Leaders Squirm

"For the elites, the only thing worse than a hick evangelical is one of these whistleblowers."

I recently finished listening to “Shepherds for Sale” by Megan Basham. It was a very interesting book and I highly recommend getting a copy to see what all the fuss is about. I have some thoughts I would like to share, as Tim Keller might say; ‘not so much about what the book says but about what the book is doing.’

What is it doing? Well, it is making many leaders in evangelical institutions squirm. These leaders have been accustomed to a certain lifestyle and modus operandi. The fact of the matter is their whole livelihood is predicated on serving the needs of evangelicals. Unfortunately, they find many of the beliefs and values of said evangelicals to be primitive and contemptible. So how do they get grandma to keep writing those checks to support their institutions? Well, it involves a lot of posturing, manipulative religious language, and of course, a considerable buy-in from other members of those institutions to keep the whole thing going.

But then comes a sort of whistleblower, naming names a showing the receipts. This doesn’t happen all that often, but it is sort of the role Megan seems to be playing in her book. For the elites, the only thing worse than a hick evangelical is one of these whistleblowers. Naming names in that fashion to them seems so deplorable, ‘it’s just not how we do things around here’. It doesn’t matter the background or credentials that said whistleblower might have, they simply become the enemy that needs to be destroyed.

I believe this is what we are seeing with many of the attacks against Megan’s book. Notice they are not simply taking issue with a few footnotes here and there, they are desperate to keep people from reading the book and in some cases actually trying to get interviews the author did wiped from the internet (which usually indicates that you probably should read the book for yourself).

This whole situation brought to mind a book I read a number of years ago “Reforming Fundamentalism” by George Marsden. The author tells the story of Fuller Seminary and in the process mentions Harold Lindsell (who similar to Megan) ended up becoming one of those deplorables by sounding the alarm and naming names in his book “The Battle For The Bible”. Of course, many of the men he named attempted to attack him and destroy his credibility. Many of those named found ways to obfuscate, and somehow remain in those “evangelical” institutions. But it did cause a stir, and it did weaken the cause of the progressives.

We are still in the thick of it, with Megan’s recently released book. I am not sure what the overall result will be. At the very least, I hope it will slow down the progressive rot in some corners of evangelicalism. Who knows, maybe it will be the death knell for some who have strayed too far. Either way, it is always encouraging to see this kind of boldness and clarity.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

"By refusing to name its own moral foundations, the state undermines its ability to openly distinguish between belief systems that can coexist within its legal and moral order and those that fundamentally conflict with them. A society that cannot articulate its core moral commitments cannot coherently defend them."
By
by Staff WriterJan 16, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026
UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

"Free communication has always posed a problem for those who seek to centralise authority. Open platforms like X allow claims to be challenged, narratives to be contested, and power to be scrutinised. That is precisely why they become targets when governments feel uncomfortable, embarrassed, or threatened."
By
by Staff WriterJan 12, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.