Image

Keep Building—Even When They Call You Bad Names

"It is no new thing for the best of men to be evil spoken of."

It can always be tempting to remain silent. Silent seems safe—especially in an age when public opinion can turn on a single word, and a person’s reputation or career can be destroyed by an accusation, true or not. But the book of Nehemiah offers a timely reminder: the fear of false accusations is no excuse for abandoning what is true and good.

As Nehemiah led the rebuilding of Jerusalem’s walls, his enemies sought to halt the work by spreading fear through false accusations. They charged Nehemiah and his men with plotting a rebellion, claiming their construction efforts were the first step in a political uprising (Neh. 6:6).

Their goal was to intimidate the builders, demoralise them, and stop the project altogether. The hope was that Nehemiah and his men would be “frightened” from their task. Through a slanderous label and false allegation, the enemies of God wanted the builders’ hands to “drop from the work, so it would not be done” (Neh. 6:9).

It’s an old strategy. If you can’t win with the truth, distort it. As the saying goes, “When debate is lost, slander becomes the instrument of the loser.” Rather than accurately portraying their political and religious opponents, Nehemiah’s enemies resorted to lies, characterising Godly men as extremists, radicals, and domestic terrorists to weaken their resolve and stall their God-given task.

Far too often, this tactic works. How many today have abandoned their convictions, not because they no longer believe them, but because they don’t want to be called bad names? “I don’t want to be considered a bigot, a racist, an extremist,” people think, “so, I best abandon any public defence of what’s now considered a controversial opinion.”

Had Nehemiah and his men caved to the fear of false labels, their God-given work would have ended. But Nehemiah did not allow fear to hinder his mission. Unlike many today, Nehemiah and his men did not listen to the false charge, nor did they allow any fear of the consequences to weaken their hands or hinder their task. Instead, Nehemiah prayed, “O God, strengthen my hands.”

In doing so, Nehemiah demonstrated for us the right response to false allegations and dangerous slander. The response to lies is not to retreat, but to pray for the strength not to fear. The antidote to fear is faithfulness. 

If Nehemiah had caved to the accusations, the wall would have not been rebuilt. And if we allow a fear of false labels to silence us today, truth, justice, and our Gospel witness will falter—surely, that ought to be a greater cause for fear.

We must remember, as Charles Spurgeon said, it is no new thing for the best of men to be evil spoken of. In fact, if we are not slandered, we might have cause to question our faithfulness to Christ. The world hated Jesus, why should we expect the world to treat his followers any better?

That’s not a license to tarnish our names by doing what is wrong, but a call to cast off the fear of losing reputation in the pursuit of what is right.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

"By refusing to name its own moral foundations, the state undermines its ability to openly distinguish between belief systems that can coexist within its legal and moral order and those that fundamentally conflict with them. A society that cannot articulate its core moral commitments cannot coherently defend them."
By
by Staff WriterJan 16, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026
UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

"Free communication has always posed a problem for those who seek to centralise authority. Open platforms like X allow claims to be challenged, narratives to be contested, and power to be scrutinised. That is precisely why they become targets when governments feel uncomfortable, embarrassed, or threatened."
By
by Staff WriterJan 12, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.