Image

God Hates a Lying Tongue

"A man’s name is more precious than gold. And as such, he who steals the former is a worse thief than he who steals the latter."

The Ninth Commandment states: “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbour.” (Ex. 20:16) The Westminster Larger Catechism defines this prohibition as such:

The duties required in the ninth commandment are: the preserving and promoting of truth between man and man, and the good name of our neighbor, as well as our own; appearing and standing for the truth; and from the heart, sincerely, freely, clearly, and fully, speaking the truth, and only the truth, in matters of judgment and justice, and in all other things whatsoever; a charitable esteem of our neighbors; loving, desiring, and rejoicing in their good name; sorrowing for, and covering of their infirmities; freely acknowledging their gifts and graces; defending their innocency; a ready receiving of a good report, and unwillingness to admit an evil report concerning them; discouraging talebearers, flatterers, and slanderers; love and care of our own good name, and defending it when need requireth; keeping of lawful promises; studying and practicing whatsoever things are true, honest, lovely, and of good report.

In the Law of Moses, false testimony was no trivial offence. It was treated as a profound evil, and the punishment matched the intended harm. If a man lied to bring another to ruin, the penalty he sought became his own.

Deuteronomy 19:16-21 states: “If a malicious witness arises to accuse a person of wrongdoing… the judges shall inquire diligently, and if the witness is a false witness… then you shall do to him as he had meant to do to his brother. So you shall purge the evil from your midst.”

It’s no small thing to charge a man with a crime he isn’t guilty of. As such, if a false accuser sought the death penalty, he would receive it instead. The principle was clear: “life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth.” The goal was justice, deterrence, and the purification of society from such evil.

But this prohibition goes beyond courtroom perjury. It condemns every form of defamation, distortion, and deceit that harms a person’s name. It is not only about lying under oath, but about smearing a man in the court of public opinion. We often call it “slander.”

Scripture treats slander as no small matter. As with many of the Ten Commandments, violating one often entails violating others. Slander is no exception—it is a compound transgression:

It rejects God’s Law, a violation of the First Commandment. It bears false testimony, a violation of the Ninth. It robs a man of his reputation, a violation of the Eighth. And it is often fueled by envy of a man’s good standing, a violation of the Tenth.

In a sense, slander also violates the Sixth Commandment. Though not physical murder, it is murder within the heart (Matt. 5:21-22). Slander is a weapon forged by hatred and resentment. As Paul reminds us, “Love…rejoices with the truth” (1 Cor. 13:6). Love does no harm to its neighbour, the Apostle said, and therefore, love cannot slander. 

As such, only hate-fuelled malice can deliberately twist a man’s words, actions, or character so as to ruin him. To do so is to mirror the enemy, not the Lord. This is because Satan is “the father of lies” (John 8:44); but God is the God of truth, who “cannot lie” (Deut. 32:4; Num. 23:19; Heb. 6:18). Jesus is “the Truth” (John 14:6), and those who follow Him must walk in the truth (1 John 1:6–7; 2 John 1:4).

And yet today, how many of us are quicker to shame the slandered than the slanderer?

Our culture rightly condemns the common thief. He is to be shamed, punished, and made to restore what he has stolen. But in a world that values material goods more than honour, a man who steals a bike may face more outrage than one who ruins another’s reputation.

A man’s name is more precious than gold. And as such, he who steals the former is a worse thief than he who steals the latter. Unlike stolen goods, which can often be recovered or restored, a tarnished reputation is much harder to recover. The nature of slander is that the theft of a man’s reputation occurs in more than one place—in the minds of the listeners. From there, it can grow like a cancer and spread like a disease.

A lifetime of integrity can be undone in a moment by a single false allegation. But in order for that false allegation to take root, listening ears must be ready to receive the ill report. Nobody utters slander to a brick wall. Without an open ear, evil speech ceases.

Just as the receiver of stolen goods shares the guilt of the thief, so the one who believes slander shares in its sin. As Charles Spurgeon put it, “If there were no listening ears, there would be no talebearing tongues. While you are a buyer of ill wares, the demand will create the supply.”

To falsely accuse is to play the part of Satan, “the accuser of the brethren.” But God’s people are not called to entertain lies, but to “purge the evil from their midst.” That includes both slanderous speech and the appetite for it. If we are to be people who love truth, we must silence falsehoods, expose evil, refuse to listen to slander, and honour the reputations of others as we would our own.

So, let us be people who walk in truth, speak in love, and protect the good names of others as sacred things. What this means is that we do not believe a charge of sin without sufficient evidence, and we do not receive the evidence unless it has gone through the necessary and orderly processes as stipulated in Scripture (see Matt. 18:15-20). 

Until then, let us close our mouths to speaking slander, and our ears from hearing it. And whenever you meet someone eager to sully the name of another, consider the possibility that there just may be more to the story than you’re aware.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.