Nine News political editor, Chris Uhlmann has launched an MSM broadside into the self-sabotaged, and slowly sinking, Victorian government.
Ulhmann took aim at the Victorian Premier, labelling the Andrews’ government’s oppressive COVID-19 response as ‘panic-stricken.’
In the piece published by the Sydney Morning Herald, Ulhmann accused Daniel Andrews of ‘destroying the village in order to save it,’ writing:
‘nowhere in [Australia’s] often-opaque democracy has a less transparent court system, bureaucracy, police force or government than Victoria.’
‘The people there have been badly served, even as some reveled in the servitude. Its systems of power have combined to deliver the wanton destruction of its vibrant society. Its government has condemned its people to a poorer future, to higher unemployment, more poverty and less opportunity.’
He reasoned that since most deaths have occurred in nursing homes, nursing homes should be better protected: ‘If you are going to throw a ring of steel around anything it should be around aged care homes, not Melbourne.’
Ulhmann also predicted a ‘global reckoning of governments,’ arguing that COVID-19 countermeasures were ‘doing more damage than the disease.’
He explained that ‘economic destruction imposed by governments will deliver millions into poverty, driving internal and external conflicts.’
Subsequently, poverty-stricken states ‘turning inward’ will push the world towards ‘more division, anger and polarization.’
Also worthy of note was Ulhmann’s damning, critical assessment of modern Australians:
“While the ‘disease has revealed the character of our leaders’, it has ‘hammered home some uncomfortable truths about us as a people. As a nation, we seem comfortable with authoritarianism and too many relish the role of prefect.'”
Caldron Pool’s editor-in-chief, Ben Davis, applauded Uhlmann, stating:
“The whole situation highlights, not only just how dangerously deaf we can be if the narrative frightens us enough, but how willing we are to part with our freedoms and rights in exchange for the promise of safety, whatever devastating impacts may follow.”
“While it’s great that people are slowly beginning to ask the same questions Caldron Pool’s writers were asking six months ago, the real questions at this point are, how much damage has been inflicted and to what extent can we actually recover? Questions we might not have had to ask if the MSM had the foresight of our writers, and our warnings had been taken seriously.”
Ulhmann’s Sydney Morning Herald piece is a criticism of the bureaucratic caste’s COVID-19 disregard for civil liberties.
It vindicates the concerns of discerning citizens who, from the start of the lockdown craze, raised awareness about the lack of assurances from politicians concerning the preservation of civil liberties.
Caldron Pool has been asking these same questions and positing the same warnings about the consequences of dubious anti-CV-19 authoritarian measures since March. We were behind the eight-ball from day one, while “fact-checkers,” and Leftists dismissed us as right-wing conspiracy theorists spreading misinformation.
As we’ve said from the beginning, there’s two sides to the coronavirus. The actual crisis, and the crisis manufactured by bureaucrats for the cameras.
Andrews’ COVID-19 response emulates Sisyphus.
The Victorian Premier is determined to keep going in one direction, applying the same damaging, flawed methods over and over again, despite (as Ulhmann pointed out) there being other options, and more information about the virus available than there was in March.
There is also a thin line between governments waging a war against the crisis, and governments waging a war against people caught up in that crisis.
Ulhmann is right. Andrews and other ‘will-to-power premiers’ have crossed that line, and the majority of Australians let them do it.