Image

£200 Million Will Be Spent on the Church of England’s Quest for Carbon Zero

"Among those priorities is Social and Racial justice, which received £12 million in the budget, with this number ballooning to £40.3 million by 2034."

The Church of England (CofE) announced a £1.6 billion clergy friendly cash splash in early June.

Ministers will receive a 10.7% stipend rise, with almost £65 million for “clergy retirement housing.”

This three-year cost projection includes “investment in new initiatives to improve choices for clergy when they retire.”

Student clergy also received a boost.

Enhanced cost-of-living considerations will further support those training for ordination.

Spending on clergy well-being, the CofE said, was part of an overall “financial simplification” programme.

To achieve this, “diocesan apportionment to the national church” had to be abolished.

Effectively, the CofE goes from a contribution-funded church to a church funded by the redistribution of wealth.

Costs paid for by the apportionment will now be sourced from Parish Shares and the CofE’s $10 billion endowment fund, managed by the Church Commissioners for England.

Abolishing the apportionment somewhat frees up money and slightly decentralises power, taking some financial burdens away from a diocese.

Each diocese will have more autonomy as far as local spending plans meet the CofE’s stated overall ministry policies, procedures, and priorities.

Among those priorities is Social and Racial justice, which received £12 million in the budget, with this number ballooning to £40.3 million by 2034.

Funding is likely to go towards the Church’s March 2025 investment in “antiracist practices” overseen by the CofE’s “first ever Racial Justice Board.”

This “Antiracist taskforce” is staffed by a committee, guided by theology read through the lens of “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), and led by SSM advocate, bishop Arun Arora and interfaith sponsor, Bishop Rosemarie Mallett.

The 71-page witch hunt for racists known as “From Lament to Action” heavily leans on the words “critical,” “systemic,” “urgency,” and mentions “diversity” 64 times.

For example, “diversity monitoring,” the context of which seems to imply every pew and its parishioner must be turned into the DEI police. (p. 20)

“Cultural” is referenced 45 times.

Another Critical Race Theory buzzword, “awareness”, is used 13 times.

A notable addition here is the suggestion that the Church become more like the world by allowing itself to be “enriched” by multiculturalism. (p.55)

As Calvin Robinson’s experience shows, the CofE’s newfound “inclusive” war on racism has some serious holes.

If the Iscariot-level inquisition wasn’t enough to raise eyebrows, there is the £200-million fight for net zero, to be played out over 9 years.

Lodged firmly in the funding is climate change catastrophism, wrapped in the theology of “protecting God’s creation.” 

“Spending plans confirm earlier proposals to invest £190 million over several triennia to support General Synod’s ambition to reach Net Zero Carbon,” the CofE press release explained.

The goal is to “limit carbon emissions,” and ensure CofE’s carbon zero quest reaches beyond 2034.

Dubbed the Target 2030: Net Zero Carbon routemap, the Church of England is “doing its bit for climate justice!”

This is because the “global climate emergency,” asserts the CofE, “is a crisis for God’s creation and a fundamental injustice.”

While the CofE’s clergy centred cash splash and the empowering of local churches are definite highlights, the budget’s Social Justice Warriorism is an obvious downside.

A broader look at the context suggests the catalyst for the CofE’s financial reform is the UK Labour Party ripping £20 million in tax relief away from churches.

Kier Starmer’s “worship tax” was rolled out in January alongside £117 million in handouts to Mosques and Islamic schools.

The CofE’s latest cost analysis and spending trajectory seems to be an indirect response to government overreach, as much as it looks like a move to ensure the church plays a part in it.

Their own words and actions infer that this new approach is less about serving the church and more about seeking socio-political relevance.

Instead of keeping in step with the Holy Spirit, as per Galatians 5, the CofE appear to have chosen to comply with, compromise, and cosy up to the spirit of the age. 

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

"By refusing to name its own moral foundations, the state undermines its ability to openly distinguish between belief systems that can coexist within its legal and moral order and those that fundamentally conflict with them. A society that cannot articulate its core moral commitments cannot coherently defend them."
By
by Staff WriterJan 16, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026
UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

"Free communication has always posed a problem for those who seek to centralise authority. Open platforms like X allow claims to be challenged, narratives to be contested, and power to be scrutinised. That is precisely why they become targets when governments feel uncomfortable, embarrassed, or threatened."
By
by Staff WriterJan 12, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.